--- title: "Concrete Book Club Idea" --- - #[[E: Ad hoc book clubs]] - Goal - getting a deeper understanding of the book - generating artefacts and processes that help us retain that knowledge in the long-term - possibly generating public artefacts useful for others - getting much wider perspectives through the diversity of group members - Book - **Thinking Fast and Slow** - pro - interesting and relevant to many of us - **Andy Matuschak** specifically called it out as an example of a book that many of us have read, but few retain much understanding from - con - very long (is it possible to choose sections, or are there sections that are fluffy and can be quicky skimmed?) - could also be something like **Knowledge Cartography** edited volume - Participants - How much energy do we expect for how long? - do people have to commit to a certain cadence or drop-in/drop-out - enable peripheral participation - seeing our work and commenting, posting on Twitter etc? - How Roam-centric is it, how much familiarity with technical tools, or specific processes? - Initially people like Jon, Joel etc, but could be expanded to people at Minerva, CSCL people, big communities - Cadence - One chapter or more per time unit (two weeks?). Would be useful to be able to divide it into chunks of equal "idea density" - maybe someone who has read it could do that - Reading book, and then spending several weeks organizing ideas instead of just chapter by chapter and that's it... But hard to keep momentum going? - Synchronous ideas - **silent meetings** - how would that work focused more on exploration than taking decisions - the **P2PU** course on CSCL, with editing in Etherpad - can we use Minerva platform? - FROG? - Annotations - Hypothes.is on a pirate PDF? - Collecting Kindle highlights and overlaying them for a heatmap (doable, but useful?) - Automated emails - reproducing **Email-driven SRS** by **Quantum Country** - JSON dumps of Roam pages, and a script that automatically merges comments to the same block - Roamex - Download JSON dump every day and have a script that uses updated-at and updated-email or other things to generate change logs, email diffs etc? - Importing JSON over existing JSON fails, because IDs are identical, if we were able to overwrite, would be able to update externally - Individual writing - Writing prompts, questions - write before you see anyone else's reactions - Are there study group questions for this book anywhere? - Note taking/summaries - useful to have some kind of summary, at least as a roadmap/collective thing to refer to (maybe there are good notes already we can use) - stimulate questions and connections, applications - somehow use Knowledge Building scaffolds? - epistemic fact checking - distributed looking into citations and seeing how well he represents them - collectively building an argument map of the points he makes, and the evidence? - then reading another book on mind/thinking etc (maybe from different perspective), and seeing how they contrast, the evidence maps mesh - could be distributed - one group reading Kahneman, another reading another book. could we generate questions for the other group? - flash mob - let's read 10 books on brain science in teams of four, and figure it all out... - Public artifacts - What would be useful for - people who are not planning to read the book - people who have not yet read the book, but plan to - people who have read the book - second cohort of book club members - Spaced repetition - reproducing **Email-driven SRS** by **Quantum Country** - collectively creating cards - sharing privately created cards - collecting SRS analytics, to determine which cards are more useful? But what is a good metric - retention? Understanding in five months? How to test, how to isolate? - Experiment - Are there hypotheses that we can formulate up front? - Is there data that we should be collecting during the process? - With a shorter book - we could iterate faster (run again, organized differently) - Lead to some kind of public write-up of the process - Second cohort? - Expert visitors - Could bring in someone from Minerva for example (faculty in neuroscience) once we have specific questions that stump us - Using our Zettelkasten - being able to bring in notes and comments from other books - but problem is that we can spend the rest of our lives discussing these issues, with the book as a thin alibi