--- title: "E: Textbook design for learning" --- - #public - Thinking about textbooks, - the [blog post](https://teacherhead.com/2020/04/20/the-next-edu-revolution-textbooks/) about why textbooks are good for learning - and all the lists of really good textbooks - **The Best Textbook on Every Subject** - Imagine taking a transcript of [[Awakening From the Meaning Crisis]]. - How long would it be, how long would the entire series be if it was published as a book? - How much editing would you need to turn it into readable prose? - What would it look like to turn it into, not a nonfiction book, but a textbook? - Where is the best research on effective textbooks for learning for efficient adult learners? - There are often many graphical elements and pedagogical elements - definitions of terms. - Pull outs with anecdotes, or more details. - And I guess this can be seen in one way, as kind of a zoomable interface where you can go more or less in depth in one way. - And you can also skip explanations if you already know the concept. - There can be - visualizations, - graphs, - knowledge graphs, - pre-reading questions - post reading questions, - learning objectives - comprehension questions. - Is there a good course, whether as a textbook or interactive on how to write a textbook? - Are there good examples of interactive textbooks? - They don't have to be intelligent, but just web native with very responsive layouts - Are there good frameworks, or tools to author very nice looking web textbooks with all these design elements? - There are probably LaTeX templates or DocBook or whatever, for programming books, but the end result is a PDF. - That is very difficult to read on a small screen. - Is there a good HTML template. - Something like Tufte style with margin annotations. Table of Contents. - It would be a really interesting candidate for experimenting with Andy Matuschak integrated spaced repetition. - It could also grow wiki like with - annotations and - links to interesting discussions, - from reading groups or blog posts, etc. - I wonder what kind of visuals, or explanations or even interactive elements, could be useful. - And to what extent they would be actually useful for the understanding or disruptive. - I often felt that textbooks from schools in Norway today are far too busy with elements graphical elements and pictures and so on. - But perhaps it is working well. - How do you test the effectiveness of a textbook? - What do you measure, at the end, retention? - It's interesting how we have never ever looked at textbooks during my PhD studies. - Yet it is such a fundamental aspect of learning. - **Open Learning Initiative** at CMU might be an interesting source. - **OpenStax** are still just very traditional textbooks, written in a different way. - Wikibooks/Wikiversity. - Brett Victor's stuff. - I started thinking of this because I was thinking about the ebooks about running a company in Norway, that I just purchased and worked through. - They are helpful because they are extremely well structured, - which probably also makes them easy to update every year. - Of course there are no pedagogical features there. - But I am so much happier with these textbooks than with a series of short videos, - like all of these **Teachable** courses and so on. Or a MOOC, or a webinar. - But why do so many people prefer videos? - Even for something as visual as drawing or painting. I think I would prefer an interactive textbook, which has many of the ideas or theories, written out. - And then, shorter or longer video clips illustrating specific visual aspects. - Is there any platform that works like that, or that even helps you build it yourself. - It would be interesting to talk to the **LearnAwesome** people who have been building these skills trees. - I wonder if **John Vervaeke** could be convinced to release his material under a Creative Commons license to enable this kind of remixing. - What would it look like to make a skills tree of [[Awakening From the Meaning Crisis]] - chopping the videos into small pieces, and interlinking them. - That's an interesting corollary to Roam, to have deep video integration with transcripts, - that you can then block indent, and you get automatically block-style back references, - so that you could quickly see all of the segments from many videos talking about for example Shamans, - just like the tools that let you edit video or audio just by editing the transcript - What would it look like to add more textbook-like features to podcasts, even though you would be listening to the actual podcast. - Think of the podcast as a class, - you would do pre work. - Maybe some short readings, maybe, reflecting on certain questions, - then you would engage with the actual podcast. - And then you will have some follow up questions, and maybe some **Spaced Repetition** questions that keep coming back to you. - Over the next few weeks or months. - Are there ways in which we can enable people to create massive amounts of high quality textbook material from the raw material that we already have. - And would it make big differences in people's ability to learn and retain. - What would popular nonfiction books look like if they were rewritten as textbooks? - Could you have a textbook overlay? - I guess in a way you have that for with reading guides for popular/non-popular fiction, for example. - Of course there are probably superficial surface features of textbooks and much more profound details about how content is organized - Are there competing pedagogical theories about textbook construction? - **Behaviourist**, **mastery learning**, others? **multimedia learning theory** and **cognitive load** theories? - Is **Distill** a kind of academic journal that has had **textbook functionality** applied to it? - I just saw a tweet saying they wanted the podcast where someone is live-sketching ideas, but I've never really been so impressed by **sketch notes** and **live sketching** - was pretty amazing the first time I saw it - but afterwards it seems to focus far too much attention on things that are not relevant to the argument. - However, having something like a **Compendium** facilitator. - Live mapping out an argument while a discussion or a debate or a complex argument is being presented could be really interesting - building out a concept map as you're talking or going back and doing it over the recording. - Why don't we have good videos of this, I should talk to **Jack Park** about it.