π Stoas near [[@anonymous@doc.anagora.org/agora ranking]]
π HedgeDoc at https://doc.anagora.org/agora-ranking π Etherpad at https://stoa.anagora.org/p/agora-ranking πΉ Jitsi at https://meet.jit.si/agora-ranking
π Node [[agora-ranking]]
β³ π Resource [[@anonymous@doc.anagora.org/agora ranking]]
RFC: how do you think we should treat ranking in this Agora, in particular as it grows?
I don't like that this kind of list could grow into a fixed hierarchy
^ agree
I think it should be configurable per user. Either by a config setting in each user's garden, or on the client side.
Different sort/rank configuration options:
- random
- order of creation
- upvotes
I'm generally wary of liking/upvote mechanisms, but they are probably OK. So long as they avoid gamification/addiction.
Not sure about putting uprank data within nodes themselves - it seems like metadata? I'm not sure I would do it, as my notes exist outside of this agora, too.
Loading context... (requires JavaScript)