Various thoughts on wiki software
Used to run this site — see [[WikiJS]].
Licensed as Business Source License — which I had not heard of. Documenting under [[Licensing]]
My fork: https://github.com/bmann/outline, setup to easily deploy to Heroku (not updated to recent head, yet). The app.json did get merged, so you should use the main version.
The other issue I had, with having multiple Google accounts logging in to one team, got solved with a small edit by someone else.
Iβd like to have a wiki that is private except for a group of (50-100) people I whitelist. Preferably free, or worst case, fixed fee that doesnβt scale with users.
Howwww do I do this!? New pricing for GitHub and Notion donβt help here, unless Iβm missing something. — [Lee Edwards (@terronk), May 19th, 2020](https://twitter.com/terronk/status/1262883499708575744 )
My response:
I’m just in the midst of setting up @requarks for personal use. It syncs to a git repo, runs on Heroku for about $16/month ($7 paid dyno & $9 paid postgres DB)
Even GitHub Free now appears to allow unlimited collaborators on a private repo.
https://paulhammant.com/2017/09/23/wikis-that-use-source-control-for-their-backing-store/
Quoted from the article:
Maintained wiki implementations
Has this to say about WikiJS:
Can be linked to a Git repo and do round trip, but the database is the main DB, with sync to/from Git being done at intervals via single committer ID. That said, it is βDocker readyβ using NodeJS and is actively maintained.
Which is not quite true. The DB is essentially a cache. The single committer is true.
My notes:
Expanding this section will automatically generate an AI synthesis of the contributions in this node.
Rendering context...