π node [[20210403125401 the_ideology_of_late_imperialism_monthly_review]]
The Ideology of Late Imperialism | Monthly Review
source : Monthly Review | The Ideology of Late Imperialism
Notes
-
The question of [[imperialism]] for Marxists began in the 20th century by trying to understand
- international capitalist competition and war
- hierarchy within world capitalism and relationship between imperialist countries and colonies
- Recent data indicates that hierarchy still exists in the capitalist world
- The author critiques Robert Brenner for dismissing imperialism as a problem
- The author highlights that [[Engels]] was already pointing out that England was beginning to form a kind of [[labor aristocracy]]
- Marx was already beginning to observe the [[problem of working classes in advanced capitalist countries abandoning socialism]]
- [[Eduard Bernstein]] believed that [[imperialism]] was novel, and that there was a possibility for progressive, socialist colonies
- The [[Second International]] was hotly divided on the question of imperialism and colonialism
- Itβs worth noting that the author defines imperialism as βthe transfer of surplus from the periphery to the capitalist centerβ
-
The author argues that [[China]] is a semi-peripheral country in the capitalist world order
- See also: [[is china imperialist?]]
- The author argues that if China is to become imperialist it would mean a dramatic increase in value transfer from the periphery
Loading context... (requires JavaScript)
π stoas (collaborative spaces) for [[20210403125401 the_ideology_of_late_imperialism_monthly_review]]
- Open document (Hedgedoc) at https://doc.anagora.org/20210403125401-the_ideology_of_late_imperialism_monthly_review
- Video call (Jitsi) at https://meet.jit.si/20210403125401-the_ideology_of_late_imperialism_monthly_review
π full text search for [[20210403125401 the_ideology_of_late_imperialism_monthly_review]]