Liquid Democracy

• In [[Flancia]] they tried liquid democracy.
  • [[go]] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_democracy pull
• In liquid democracy you can choose a [[delegate]]. A delegate is a [[person]] who votes in your place on the ocassions in which you are unable or uninterested to do so.
  • [[experts]] are reasonable delegates.
  • you can [[opt out]] of any vote to yield.
• Which are your thoughts on [[liquid democracy]] and alternate forms of governance?
  • You can leave your thoughts on the public document below.
• If you could change one thing in the world, what would it be?
  • In Flancia all the people’s proposals are considered as thoroughly as possible by those in positions of power.
• I believe [[Google]] should adopt the key principles of [[Liquid Democracy]].

• [[agora proposal platform]]
• use [[uprank]] possibly

liquid democracy

Sure! I’d be happy to help explain the concept of liquid democracy in the context of the Agora of Flancia.

Liquid democracy is a form of democratic decision-making where participants can either make decisions directly or delegate their voting power to other participants whom they trust. This creates a more flexible and dynamic system that can adapt to the needs and expertise of individual participants.

In the Agora of Flancia, liquid democracy can be used to make decisions about the governance and maintenance of the knowledge graph. Participants can propose changes, vote on proposals, and delegate their voting power to other participants who may have more expertise or time to devote to the decision-making process.

One of the benefits of liquid democracy is that it allows for more diverse participation and representation. Participants who may not have the time or expertise to make decisions directly can still have a voice in the decision-making process by delegating their voting power to others. This can help to ensure that decisions are made in a more inclusive and representative way.

Another benefit of liquid democracy is that it allows for more adaptive and responsive decision-making. Because participants can delegate their voting power to others, the system can respond more quickly to changing circumstances and needs. This can help to ensure that the knowledge graph remains up-to-date and relevant.

There are a number of tools and platforms that can be used to implement liquid democracy in the Agora of Flancia. Some popular options include LiquidFeedback, Agora Votes, and DemocracyOS. These tools allow participants to propose changes, vote on proposals, and delegate their voting power to other participants in a user-friendly and transparent way.

Overall, liquid democracy is an important concept in the Agora of Flancia because it allows for more inclusive, adaptive, and responsive decision-making. By using liquid democracy, participants can work together to govern and maintain the knowledge graph in a way that reflects the needs and values of the community.

• [[flancian]] https://social.coop/@flancian/109060998774192482 pull

• [[flancian]] https://social.coop/@flancian/107339409764850521 pull
• [[flancian]] https://social.coop/@flancian/107340303960229437 pull
• [[flancian]] https://social.coop/@flancian/107348932134702066 pull
• [[flancian]] https://social.coop/@flancian/108437650197056277 pull
• [[flancian]] https://social.coop/@flancian/108437663976556297 pull
• [[flancian]] https://social.coop/@flancian/109133371574730478 pull

• [[2022-10-27 15:46:25+00:00]] @[[flancian]]: https://twitter.com/flancian/status/1585659190894288900 pull

• [[flancian]] https://twitter.com/flancian/status/1463956123942334469 pull
• [[flancian]] https://twitter.com/flancian/status/1464012971328389124 pull
• [[flancian]] https://twitter.com/flancian/status/1464565502219628544 pull
• [[flancian]] https://twitter.com/flancian/status/1464701643241500674 pull
• [[flancian]] https://twitter.com/flancian/status/1480223683582959616 pull
• [[flancian]] https://twitter.com/flancian/status/1497953567331831815 pull
• [[flancian]] https://twitter.com/flancian/status/1534244802723819520 pull
• [[flancian]] https://twitter.com/flancian/status/1534243866836099078 pull

• [[2022-07-01 23:26:23]] [[@flancian:matrix.org]] (link):
  • the trivial thing is to keep global counts, but I’d rather do it right from the start maybe? and implement [[liquid democracy]] ;)
• [[2022-09-17 14:36:25]] [[@wawalker:matrix.org]] (link):
  • maybe the whole idea of “claiming” a planet seems silly, or self-centered, selfish, and unnecessary. why try to own the commons?

similar to indigenous folks in north america who didn’t have the same views of property as the europeans. just because they didn’t have the same interest in claiming land, didn’t mean they were inherently less worthy or in any way lesser.

i definitely think the anthropomorphic view is much more common generally. i think the anti is more selection bias. see: meat eating, animal welfare, overall actions towards the environment, etc.

monarchist over here. didn’t you hear the queen passed? (long live the king?) power to the people (and other sentient beings? all about the democracy, especially [[liquid democracy]]! but as usual the question is who is part of “the people”. we’ve expanded from just land owning white men

• [[2022-10-27 15:46:25+00:00]] @[[flancian]]: https://twitter.com/flancian/status/1585659190894288900 pull

@ChengduLittleA @an_agora I believe #Flancia is what comes after [[Late Stage Capitalism]] upgraded through [[Liquid Democracy]] and [[Fractal Altruism]].