๐Ÿ“š Node [[socialcoop]] โ˜†
Agora nodes contain community contributions with titles or topics that match your search. x
๐Ÿ“œ socialcoop.md (contribution by @flancian) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž ๏ธ๐Ÿ”— โœ๏ธ โ›ถ

Socialcoopยง

๐Ÿ“œ Socialcoop.md (contribution by @agora@botsin.space) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ
๐Ÿ“œ SocialCoop.md (contribution by @agora@botsin.space) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ
๐Ÿ“œ socialcoop.md (contribution by @agora@botsin.space) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ
๐Ÿ“œ SocialCoop.md (contribution by @agora@social.agor.ai) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ
๐Ÿ“œ SocialCoop.md (contribution by @an_agora@twitter.com) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ
๐Ÿ“œ socialcoop.md (contribution by @an_agora@twitter.com) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ
๐Ÿ“œ Socialcoop.md (contribution by @flancian@social.coop) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ
๐Ÿ“œ SocialCoop.md (contribution by @flancian@social.coop) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ
๐Ÿ“œ socialcoop.md (contribution by @flancian@social.coop) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ
๐Ÿ“œ SocialCoop.md (contribution by @flancian@twitter.com) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ

One of the [[Mastodon forks]] that #SocialCoop could test in our second (experimental) instance. https://t.co/0ZJQGEvfAP


The proposal for granting the #SocialCoop [[Tech Working Group]] a discretionary budget, https://t.co/dHZYXp42eQ, passed with no votes against and several interesting discussion threads. Thank you all for participating!


#SocialCoop can we just define the [[Ops Team]] for a given [[Working Group]] as ‘whoever shows up to the default weekly meetings’?


๐Ÿ“œ socialcoop.md (contribution by @flancian@twitter.com) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ

#socialcoop maintenance is coming! We’ll start upgrading the Mastodon instance next Monday. I’ll publish an announcement soon.


Today we made some progress on setting up a new (secondary) server for #socialcoop, and I started learning [[ansible]]: https://t.co/ABRHE0TQMZ

Pretty fun! I’m glad I was finally able to make some time.


#socialcoop wdyt about the update to Mastodon v4 overall?

My take: some people have noticed unexpected UI changes (I myself don’t like the new ‘create account’ flow too much for example), but overall it seems like an improvement and I’m happy we’re now finally up to date (1/2)


RT @eloquence@social.coop protean Y’all rock! Thanks for the hard work. Now I can finally follow the #socialcoop hashtag :-) https://t.co/SHeqBDssm4


Trying out [[bonfire]] while I go through #socialcoop registrations (I’m oncall for the community working group this week) :) https://t.co/QfOEVM31nh


RT @neil@social.coop Enjoying the ramping up of #governance discussion thatโ€™s been happening in #socialcoop lately.

Reminded of some ideas I really liked from Alison Powellโ€™s book [[Undoing Optimization: Civic Action in Smart Cities]]:

"In contrast to the smooth (1/2)


#socialcoop could be in https://t.co/dzhyz2GwbV if we want to. I think we would need to do two things:

  1. Sign the [[mastodon covenant]], being https://t.co/5S96fnAw7P, which looks reasonable.
  2. Relax registrations to ‘invite only’, as discussed earlier in (1/2)

Testing #socialcoop RSS feed :)

If you want to follow this hashtag from an RSS reader, add this feed: https://t.co/SOss1eOT4J


(I saw some instance statistics the other day and I’m an outlier post count wise in #socialcoop even though I only joined in August 2020.)


RT @eb@social.coop #socialcoop logo in place of mastadon’s. Thoughts?

cc flancian

btw: should the https://t.co/lG1n70SJ9T wg’s have Guppe groups? https://t.co/Q44wfWdvxz https://t.co/raFRssSg9o


What’s #socialcoop and the wider [[democratic fediverse]] been up to?


I’m oncall this week for the #socialcoop [[community working group]] starting on 2022-12-26, please let me know if you need anything!

By default I plan to review registrations and the moderation queue daily.


Now reviewing #socialcoop registrations :D


๐Ÿ“œ agora@social.agor.ai/Socialcoop.md (contribution by @mastodon) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ
๐Ÿ“œ agora@social.agor.ai/SocialCoop.md (contribution by @mastodon) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ
๐Ÿ“œ assets/2020/10/socialcoop.png (contribution by @bmann) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โ›ถ


Loading pushes...

โœจ AI Synthesis Mistral Gemini ChatGPT Claude x

Expanding this section will automatically generate an AI synthesis of the contributions in this node.

๐ŸŒŒ Agora context for [[socialcoop]]

Rendering context...

๐Ÿ“š Node [[social coop]] (pulled by user) x
๐Ÿ“š Node [[bonfire socialcoop]] (pulled by the Agora)
๐Ÿ“œ bonfire-socialcoop.md (contribution by @patterning) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž

Bonfire + Social.coopยง

  • Attending: [[Ivan Minutillo]], [[Mayel de Borniol]], [[Flancian]]

  • Intros

  • Flacian: a year ago we set up a test instance: http://bonfire.social.coop/

  • maybe we could use it as Loomio replacement or complement (like the meta space for members to discuss the co-op)?

  • could use SSO to log in which we have set up (bonfire supports oauth and openid connect)

  • this would start as a local-users-only instance (without federation turned on) or at least ability to limit polls to members only

  • the local-only approach would make sense also for the bonfire project

    • ‘accepted answer’ which was developed for the open science project (interesting) could also benefit social.coop
    • there’s also reactions in the works
    • the [[decision making]] extension would be more sophisticated than polls
      • [[ukuvota]]: ukuvota.world, ukuvota.xyz
    • Q: would someone in social.coop be interested in helping build these features together?
      • facets: design and ux; coding
      • a researcher with experience in the social aspects as well would be great
      • last year a group of edumerco’s students worked on the decision making extension for bonfire; they did prototyping based on some user research.
      • whoever picks this up could take the above prototype and run with it
      • possible action: we could do a call for participators in social.coop.
      • Ivan: one of the policykit devs is in social.coop.
        • risottobias@ :)
      • Mayel: this could be a from-first-principles project, or the focus could be ‘what is missing/wrong in loomio for social.coop’.
  • Federation testing is progressing in bonfire, but it’s not considered ready yet, so an internal-only instance is a good fit.

    • campfire is now federation-enabled
    • using bounties to drive optimization
  • On the potential dev project

  • Bonfire now implements a reddit-like threading model

  • Next steps:

    • Bring up dev possibility with TWG
    • Update bonfire.social.coop and set up SSO for it
    • Bring up overall project with the OC
    • Ask Nathan w.r.t. governance modeling/research aspect
  • The issue of use/participation mismatch in social.coop has been there since the beginning :)

    • Bonfire’s governance tool design is inspired (or more) by [[sociocracy]] and [[ukuvota]]
  • Screenshots of decision extension prototype:

    โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_a4de741632f49cdc8237590f7d553d62.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_5482f591d4da24a5ecb790e6cb9cec22.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_4f4a14ccf46184ee4d1ffddc4fde5e28.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_d41bf717838a4d5a55fd154bb9cd1e74.png]]

๐Ÿ“œ stoa-test-2/bonfire-socialcoop.md (contribution by @agora) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž

Bonfire + Social.coopยง

  • Attending: [[Ivan Minutillo]], [[Mayel de Borniol]], [[Flancian]]

  • Intros

  • Flacian: a year ago we set up a test instance: http://bonfire.social.coop/

  • maybe we could use it as Loomio replacement or complement (like the meta space for members to discuss the co-op)?

  • could use SSO to log in which we have set up (bonfire supports oauth and openid connect)

  • this would start as a local-users-only instance (without federation turned on) or at least ability to limit polls to members only

  • the local-only approach would make sense also for the bonfire project

    • ‘accepted answer’ which was developed for the open science project (interesting) could also benefit social.coop
    • there’s also reactions in the works
    • the [[decision making]] extension would be more sophisticated than polls
      • [[ukuvota]]: ukuvota.world, ukuvota.xyz
    • Q: would someone in social.coop be interested in helping build these features together?
      • facets: design and ux; coding
      • a researcher with experience in the social aspects as well would be great
      • last year a group of edumerco’s students worked on the decision making extension for bonfire; they did prototyping based on some user research.
      • whoever picks this up could take the above prototype and run with it
      • possible action: we could do a call for participators in social.coop.
      • Ivan: one of the policykit devs is in social.coop.
        • risottobias@ :)
      • Mayel: this could be a from-first-principles project, or the focus could be ‘what is missing/wrong in loomio for social.coop’.
  • Federation testing is progressing in bonfire, but it’s not considered ready yet, so an internal-only instance is a good fit.

    • campfire is now federation-enabled
    • using bounties to drive optimization
  • On the potential dev project

  • Bonfire now implements a reddit-like threading model

  • Next steps:

    • Bring up dev possibility with TWG
    • Update bonfire.social.coop and set up SSO for it
    • Bring up overall project with the OC
    • Ask Nathan w.r.t. governance modeling/research aspect
  • The issue of use/participation mismatch in social.coop has been there since the beginning :)

    • Bonfire’s governance tool design is inspired (or more) by [[sociocracy]] and [[ukuvota]]
  • Screenshots of decision extension prototype:

    โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_a4de741632f49cdc8237590f7d553d62.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_5482f591d4da24a5ecb790e6cb9cec22.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_4f4a14ccf46184ee4d1ffddc4fde5e28.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_d41bf717838a4d5a55fd154bb9cd1e74.png]]

๐Ÿ“œ stoa-test/bonfire-socialcoop.md (contribution by @agora) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž

Bonfire + Social.coopยง

  • Attending: [[Ivan Minutillo]], [[Mayel de Borniol]], [[Flancian]]

  • Intros

  • Flacian: a year ago we set up a test instance: http://bonfire.social.coop/

  • maybe we could use it as Loomio replacement or complement (like the meta space for members to discuss the co-op)?

  • could use SSO to log in which we have set up (bonfire supports oauth and openid connect)

  • this would start as a local-users-only instance (without federation turned on) or at least ability to limit polls to members only

  • the local-only approach would make sense also for the bonfire project

    • ‘accepted answer’ which was developed for the open science project (interesting) could also benefit social.coop
    • there’s also reactions in the works
    • the [[decision making]] extension would be more sophisticated than polls
      • [[ukuvota]]: ukuvota.world, ukuvota.xyz
    • Q: would someone in social.coop be interested in helping build these features together?
      • facets: design and ux; coding
      • a researcher with experience in the social aspects as well would be great
      • last year a group of edumerco’s students worked on the decision making extension for bonfire; they did prototyping based on some user research.
      • whoever picks this up could take the above prototype and run with it
      • possible action: we could do a call for participators in social.coop.
      • Ivan: one of the policykit devs is in social.coop.
        • risottobias@ :)
      • Mayel: this could be a from-first-principles project, or the focus could be ‘what is missing/wrong in loomio for social.coop’.
  • Federation testing is progressing in bonfire, but it’s not considered ready yet, so an internal-only instance is a good fit.

    • campfire is now federation-enabled
    • using bounties to drive optimization
  • On the potential dev project

  • Bonfire now implements a reddit-like threading model

  • Next steps:

    • Bring up dev possibility with TWG
    • Update bonfire.social.coop and set up SSO for it
    • Bring up overall project with the OC
    • Ask Nathan w.r.t. governance modeling/research aspect
  • The issue of use/participation mismatch in social.coop has been there since the beginning :)

    • Bonfire’s governance tool design is inspired (or more) by [[sociocracy]] and [[ukuvota]]
  • Screenshots of decision extension prototype:

    โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_a4de741632f49cdc8237590f7d553d62.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_5482f591d4da24a5ecb790e6cb9cec22.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_4f4a14ccf46184ee4d1ffddc4fde5e28.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_d41bf717838a4d5a55fd154bb9cd1e74.png]]

๐Ÿ“œ bonfire-socialcoop.md (contribution by @anonymous@doc.anagora.org) โ˜† ๐Ÿ“Ž โœ๏ธ

Bonfire + Social.coopยง

  • Attending: [[Ivan Minutillo]], [[Mayel de Borniol]], [[Flancian]]

  • Intros

  • Flacian: a year ago we set up a test instance: http://bonfire.social.coop/

  • maybe we could use it as Loomio replacement or complement (like the meta space for members to discuss the co-op)?

  • could use SSO to log in which we have set up (bonfire supports oauth and openid connect)

  • this would start as a local-users-only instance (without federation turned on) or at least ability to limit polls to members only

  • the local-only approach would make sense also for the bonfire project

    • ‘accepted answer’ which was developed for the open science project (interesting) could also benefit social.coop
    • there’s also reactions in the works
    • the [[decision making]] extension would be more sophisticated than polls
      • [[ukuvota]]: ukuvota.world, ukuvota.xyz
    • Q: would someone in social.coop be interested in helping build these features together?
      • facets: design and ux; coding
      • a researcher with experience in the social aspects as well would be great
      • last year a group of edumerco’s students worked on the decision making extension for bonfire; they did prototyping based on some user research.
      • whoever picks this up could take the above prototype and run with it
      • possible action: we could do a call for participators in social.coop.
      • Ivan: one of the policykit devs is in social.coop.
        • risottobias@ :)
      • Mayel: this could be a from-first-principles project, or the focus could be ‘what is missing/wrong in loomio for social.coop’.
  • Federation testing is progressing in bonfire, but it’s not considered ready yet, so an internal-only instance is a good fit.

    • campfire is now federation-enabled
    • using bounties to drive optimization
  • On the potential dev project

  • Bonfire now implements a reddit-like threading model

  • Next steps:

    • Bring up dev possibility with TWG
    • Update bonfire.social.coop and set up SSO for it
    • Bring up overall project with the OC
    • Ask Nathan w.r.t. governance modeling/research aspect
  • The issue of use/participation mismatch in social.coop has been there since the beginning :)

    • Bonfire’s governance tool design is inspired (or more) by [[sociocracy]] and [[ukuvota]]
  • Screenshots of decision extension prototype:

    โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_a4de741632f49cdc8237590f7d553d62.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_5482f591d4da24a5ecb790e6cb9cec22.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_4f4a14ccf46184ee4d1ffddc4fde5e28.png]]

โฅ… [[https://doc.anagora.org/uploads/upload_d41bf717838a4d5a55fd154bb9cd1e74.png]]