πŸ“š Agora node [[science]] β˜†
Agora nodes contain community contributions with titles or topics that match your search. x
πŸ“œ File science.md by @flancian β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️ β›Ά

ScienceΒ§

πŸ“œ File science.md by @neil β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️ β›Ά

scienceΒ§

πŸ“œ File Science.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž β›Ά
πŸ“œ File science.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž β›Ά
πŸ“œ File science.md by @agora@social.agor.ai β˜† πŸ“Ž β›Ά
πŸ“œ File science.md by @an_agora@twitter.com β˜† πŸ“Ž β›Ά
πŸ“œ File Science.md by @anagora@matrix.org β˜† πŸ“Ž β›Ά
πŸ“œ File science.md by @flancian@twitter.com β˜† πŸ“Ž β›Ά

her in 1944, even though she had given the first theoretical explanation.

Albert Einstein called Meitner β€œour Marie Curie." She also adamantly refused to work on the atomic bomb during WWII. https://t.co/JCWerQSjM2 #women #history #science #energy https://t.co/RrNiC6MBaZ (2/2) https://t.co/RvKy0znsMm


πŸ“œ File agora@social.agor.ai/science.md by @mastodon β˜† πŸ“Ž β›Ά

Loading pushes...

✨ AI Synthesis Mistral Gemini ChatGPT Claude x

Expanding this section will automatically generate an AI synthesis of the contributions in this node.

🌌 Agora context for [[science]]

Rendering context...

πŸ“š Agora node [[experiment]] (pulled by user) x
πŸ“š Agora node [[scientific method]] (pulled by user) x
πŸ“š Agora node [[scientist]] (pulled by user) x
πŸ“š Agora node [[20200721210255 science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File 20200721210255-science.org by @ryan β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[20210310111808 wtf_is_marxism_dialectics_shake_the_world_mortal_science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File literature/20210310111808-wtf_is_marxism_dialectics_shake_the_world_mortal_science.org by @ryan β˜† πŸ“Ž

source

  • Derrick says that the thing that unties Marxists historically is the [[file:../20210310111947-labor_theory_of_value.org][labor theory of value]]

  • Ezri says that if you hold that socialismis just a form of managed capitalism, then you must think of exploitationin a different way than Marx did

  • Ezri says that dialectical materialismis, broadly, a philosophy of science not just social phenomena

  • Dialecticshave been around since ancient Greek times as a means of argumentation, Hegel#39;s innovation is that he turns it into an ontology

    • Hegel's dialectics only works on ideas because for Hegel ideas are the only things that are real

  • What is unique to capitalism is reinvestment and wage labor i.e. labor as a market

  • The business cycle appears once you get industrial production

  • Derrick remarks that a lot of state activity is the battling between various factions of the bourgeoisie rather than class antagonisms

  • "Communism is the removal of alienationfrom the productive realm"

  • Classical dialectics is about creating definitions from a description or discussion so as to move to axiomatic logic

πŸ“š Agora node [[20210310112616 philosophy_of_science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File 20210310112616-philosophy_of_science.org by @ryan β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[20210407163715 computer_science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File 20210407163715-computer_science.org by @ryan β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[20210720193512 institution_of_science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File 20210720193512-institution_of_science.org by @ryan β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[20260920 What if medicine took justice as seriously as science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File posts/20260920-What if medicine took justice as seriously as science.md by @jaysen β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”—

What if Medicine took justice as seriously as science?Β§

β€œOver time, trying to answer that question became my life’s work. Now it has a name: Justice-Based Medicine. At its heart is a simple proposition: justice is not an optional extra to good medicine, it is part of the treatment.”

substack.com/@drguddisingh : What if Medicine took justice as seriously as science?

πŸ“š Agora node [[a new kind of science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File a new kind of science.md by @flancian β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

A New Kind of ScienceΒ§

πŸ“š Agora node [[annotated hub of science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File annotated hub of science.md by @flancian β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

annotated hub of scienceΒ§

https://twitter.com/metasj/status/1383455991895781381

πŸ“š Agora node [[citizen science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File citizen-science.md by @neil β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

citizen scienceΒ§

πŸ“š Agora node [[citizenscience]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File CitizenScience.md by @an_agora@twitter.com β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[climate science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File climate-science.md by @neil β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

climate scienceΒ§

Edwards calls climate science a β€˜vast machine’ in that it is β€˜a sociotechnical system that collects data, models physical processes, tests theories, and ultimately generates a widely shared understanding of climate and [[climate change]]

[[Half-Earth Socialism]]

πŸ“š Agora node [[complexity science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File complexity-science.md by @neil β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

complexity scienceΒ§

Insights from complexity science help move beyond a Newtonian worldview of cause and effect to one that is holistic, nonlinear, and interactive.

– [[Free, Fair and Alive]]

Complexity science offers a more coherent way of explaining how functional design can emerge without a designer. Design happens as adaptive agents (such as commoners) interact with each other. The self-organization of agents β€” what we call β€œ[[peer organization]]” in a commons β€” gives rise incrementally to complex organizational systems. There is no master blueprint or top-down, expert-driven knowledge behind the process. It emerges from agents responding to their own local, bounded circumstances.

– [[Free, Fair and Alive]]

SeeΒ§

πŸ“š Agora node [[computationalneuroscience]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File ComputationalNeuroscience.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[computer science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File computer-science.md by @anagora@matrix.org β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[computerscience]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File ComputerScience.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[data science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File Artificial Intelligence/Watson AI Overview/Module 2 - Available Watson AI Services/Data Science.md by @KGBicheno β˜† πŸ“Ž

Data ScienceΒ§

Go to [[The Golem Project Overview]], [[Main AI Page]], [[Econometrics Main Page]], or the [[Master Contents Page]].

A picture of a data centre thanks to Taylor Vick for sharing their work on Unsplash

This definition comes from Wikipedia.

Data science is an inter-disciplinary field that uses scientific methods, processes, algorithms and systems to extract knowledge and insights from many structural and unstructured data.[1][2] Data science is related to data mining, machine learning and big data.

Data science is a "concept to unify statistics, data analysis and their related methods" in order to "understand and analyze actual phenomena" with data.[3] It uses techniques and theories drawn from many fields within the context of mathematics, statistics, computer science, domain knowledge and information science. Turing award winner Jim Gray imagined data science as a "fourth paradigm" of science (empirical, theoretical, computational and now data-driven) and asserted that "everything about science is changing because of the impact of information technology" and the data deluge.[4][5] 

The Data Science Venn DiagramΒ§

The Data Science Venn Diagram

πŸ“œ File data-science.md by @neil β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

Data scienceΒ§

πŸ“š Agora node [[datascience]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File DataScience.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“œ File datascience.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[enaction toward a new paradigm for cognitive science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science.md by @an_agora@twitter.com β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[eternal truths of mathematics and science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File eternal truths of mathematics and science.md by @vera β˜† πŸ“Ž
  • A pseudo religion I created in high school that essentialy worships [[science]] and [[mathematics]]
πŸ“š Agora node [[geometryistheonlyscience]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File GeometryIsTheOnlyScience.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[i cant believe its not science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File i-cant-believe-its-not-science.md by @neil β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

I Can’t Believe It’s Not Science!Β§

πŸ“š Agora node [[ibm digital badge python for applied data science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File Programming/Python/Week5/IBM Digital Badge - Python for Applied Data Science.md by @KGBicheno β˜† πŸ“Ž

IBM Digital Badge - Python for Applied Data ScienceΒ§

Go to the [[Python Week 5 Main Page]] or the [[Python - Main Page]] Also see [[Econometrics Main Page]] or the [[Economics main page]]

IBM Python for Applied Data Science Badge

Here’s a backup screenshot link: https://i.imgur.com/l6jSdf7.png

πŸ“š Agora node [[information science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File information science.md by @flancian β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️
πŸ“š Agora node [[learning science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File learning-science.md by @neil β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

Learning scienceΒ§

πŸ“š Agora node [[metascience]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File metascience.md by @an_agora@twitter.com β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[network science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File network science.md by @flancian β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

Network ScienceΒ§

πŸ“œ File network science.md by @an_agora@twitter.com β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[neuroscience]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File Neuroscience.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“œ File neuroscience.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[on exactitude in science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File on-exactitude-in-science.md by @neil β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

On Exactitude in ScienceΒ§

[[Jorge Luis Borges]].

πŸ“š Agora node [[openscience]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File OpenScience.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“œ File openscience.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“œ File OpenScience.md by @an_agora@twitter.com β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[public library of science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File public-library-of-science.md by @neil β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

Public Library of ScienceΒ§

πŸ“š Agora node [[r a decade of theory as reflected in psychological science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File content/R- A decade of theory as reflected in Psychological Science.md by @scalingsynthesis β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️
πŸ“š Agora node [[r epistemology and the socio cognitive perspective in information science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File content/R- Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science.md by @scalingsynthesis β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️
  • #[[references]]
    • Tags:: #[[references]] #[[D/Synthesis Infrastructure]] #interdisciplinarity #[[Domain-Analysis]]
    • Title: Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science
    • Meta:
    • Content
      • Abstract
        • This article presents a socio-cognitive perspective in relation to information science (IS) and information retrieval (IR). The differences between traditional cognitive views and the socio-cognitive or domain-analytic view are outlined. It is claimed that, given elementary skills in computer-based retrieval, people are basically interacting with representations of subject literatures in IR. The kind of knowledge needed to interact with representations of subject literatures is discussed. It is shown how different approaches or β€œparadigms” in the represented literature imply different information needs and relevance criteria (which users typically cannot express very well, which is why IS cannot primarily rely on user studies). These principles are exemplified by comparing behaviorism, cognitivism, psychoanalysis, and neuroscience as approaches in psychology. The relevance criteria implicit in each position are outlined, and empirical data are provided to prove the theoretical claims. It is further shown that the most general level of relevance criteria is implied by epistemological theories. The article concludes that the fundamental problems of IS and IR are based in epistemology, which therefore becomes the most important allied field for IS. - #lit-context
    • Seems classic (475 cites on GS, plus part of line of work around domain analysis) [[Domain-Analysis]] approach
      • Author also seems super important in this space - #[[πŸ“ lit-notes]]
    • Disciplines have deep-rooted and consequential differences in what counts as "relevant" information. Some are characterized by [[paradigmatic relevance]], where the meaning of terms, and what therefore counts as relevant results for that term, vary substantially by "school of thought". #Relevance
πŸ“š Agora node [[social science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File social_science.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž
πŸ“š Agora node [[society for social studies of science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File society-for-social-studies-of-science.md by @neil β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

Society for Social Studies of ScienceΒ§

URL : https://www.4sonline.org/

πŸ“š Agora node [[soil science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File soil science.md by @goldfishlaser β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”—

soil scienceΒ§

Core ideaΒ§

Soil Science aims to identify good soil. Good soil has adequete amounts of moisture, air, humus, and minerals to support plants.

Healthy soil typically consists of 20 percent clay, 40 percent silt, and 40 percent sand. Plant roots absorb/access nutrients best when the pH is in the 5.5 to 7 range.

  • Cut straight into the soil with a shovel or trowel 6 to 8 inches deep, making a V-shaped hole.
  • Cut a 1-inch wide slice of soil the length of the hole from one side. Take a 1-inch strip from the center of this slice to use in your sample.
  • Repeat sampling randomly around the garden and mix the samples together in a clean glass jar or bucket.

Water Drainage Test

Composition Test

PH level

NPK test [[Nitrogen]]-[[Phosphorous]]-[[Potassium]]

https://www.almanac.com/content/3-simple-diy-soil-tests

[[soil]]

πŸ“š Agora node [[systems theory in political science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File systems-theory-in-political-science.md by @neil β˜† πŸ“Ž οΈπŸ”— ✍️

systems theory in political scienceΒ§

πŸ“š Agora node [[the value of science]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File Readwise/Articles/The Value of Science.md by @protopian β˜† πŸ“Ž

The Value of ScienceΒ§

rw-book-cover

MetadataΒ§

HighlightsΒ§

  • Scientific knowledge is an enabling power to do either good or bad — but it does not carry instructions on how to use it.
  • Our freedom to doubt was born of a struggle against authority in the early days of science. It was a very deep and strong struggle. Permit us to question — to doubt, that’s all — not to be sure. And I think it is important that we do not forget the importance of this struggle and thus perhaps lose what we have gained. Here lies a responsibility to society.
  • Communications between nations must promote understanding: So went another dream. But the machines of communication can be channeled or choked. What is communicated can be truth or lie. Communication is a strong force also, but for either good or bad.
πŸ“š Agora node [[womeninscience]] (pulled by the Agora)
πŸ“œ File womeninscience.md by @agora@botsin.space β˜† πŸ“Ž