1014
https://habr.com/ru/articles/781798/
Хорошее введение в иероглифы. Я это всё знал, что показывает совсем уж входной уровень материала, но интересно всё равно.
[[4]] is not a centered hexagonal number.
The closest centered hexagonal numbers are [[1]] (index # [[1]]) and [[7]] (index # [[2]]).
First 20 centered hexagonal numbers: [[1]], [[7]], [[19]], [[37]], [[61]], [[91]], [[127]], [[169]], [[217]], [[271]], [[331]], [[397]], [[469]], [[547]], [[631]], [[721]], [[817]], [[919]], [[1027]], [[1141]].
[[square]]: 16
[[square root]]: 2.0000
[[cube]]: 64
[[cube root]]: 1.5874
[[natural log]] (ln): 1.3863
[[base-10 log]] (log10): 0.6021
[[base-2 log]] (log2): 2.0000
Expanding this section will automatically generate an AI synthesis of the contributions in this node.
Rendering context...
https://habr.com/ru/articles/781798/
Хорошее введение в иероглифы. Я это всё знал, что показывает совсем уж входной уровень материала, но интересно всё равно.
Most approaches that have been proposed fall into one of four categories: (1) reliance on hard copy, (2) reliance on standards, (3) reliance on computer museums, or (4) reliance on migration. Though some of these may play a role in an ultimate solution, none of them comes close to providing a solution by itself, nor does their combination.
On archival.
https://music.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_k78a09wUsluNJnDRnxsXAvwDto95lIJes
I like this album by Nils Frahm
https://www.marginalia.nu/log/60-prescriptive-descriptions/
Viktor asserts that being a night person means that you go to sleep late not because it's your organism demand, but because it's your habit, id est it's your choice. I'm writing this as I'm transitioning to being an early bird.
Then he gives some motivational talk.

layout: post title: "CNET: VoIP top priority for Bell Canada in 2004" created: 1071735540 categories:
Another VoIP article to fan the flames. The chosen quote shows how this is actually mis-titled:
Michael Sabia, chief executive officer of the Canadian Baby Bell, outlined his company’s strategy for moving all of its communications services onto an IP-based communications network.
The distinction here being that they are moving their core network to IP. Well duh! This does not mean VoIP — it means that inside the core, all the traffic (even if it starts life as analog) gets shunted over IP, instead of continuing to use analog connections.
But it seems like there are some end-user plans as well. Read on.
Bell Canada plans to launch a consumer VoIP trial in early 2004, and it will also progress with IP TV trials. The company plans to more aggressively market VoIP services to small and midsize businesses.
I think “aggressively market” is code for “make prices less ridiculous”. The IP TV fits with Bell’s goals of being a converged communications carrier. They already offer Bell ExpressVu satellite services today.
I continue to say that getting video to the home isn’t the tricky part — it gets hard when you want to start pushing some fairly large video streams around the home to multiple devices: I did a study on in-home distribution methods, and there are cost and/or bandwidth issues with every technology in use today (e.g. what significant other is going to allow Ethernet cables tacked along walls throughout the house? Never mind the cost of installing those cables…).
The other issue used to be the backplane capacity of the <acronym title="Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer">DSLAMs</acronym> being used — the switch that connected DSL customers to the larger network didn’t have a large enough upstream connection to support the required number of video streams. I’m assuming that’s been solved.
Basically, once you start pushing converged services into a home, the need for a home server, home gateway, multimedia PC, etc. etc. becomes greater. Something “smart” that sits at the edge of the service provider network and the home network.
And yes, Rogers is doing the VoIP thing too, although they’ve specifically said it won’t be here until 2005.
layout: post title: Skype to Speak Out at VON Canada 2004 created: 1083336303 categories:
As the communication industry press starts to understand the significance of [co-founder and CEO of Skype, Niklas Zennstrom’s] presence at our conference, I expect the number of press requests to attend VON Canada 2004 to just continue to rise. Jeff Pulver Blog
Hmmm…wonder if Jeff will let me attend as part of the “blogging press”. Look at all the VoIP stuff I publish!
Much like the low level of education around VoIP in general, there are many people that haven’t heard about Skype either. Jeff’s right when he says that Zennstrom’s presence will cause some press interest, and likely raise the level of awareness.
I am going to try to make it to VON Canada one way or another.
layout: post title: Primus Talkbroadband is currently down (June 1, 2004) created: 1086135158 categories:
The TalkBroadband service is currently down. The tech support page has not been updated.
Patricia H. at tech support from Primus explained this to me, as they apparently don’t have access to update the website. There is no ETA, and she was not able to say what the problem may be.
Primus tech support may or may not be checking in here to leave comments.
Update: the status has been updated to say "the system is down" (obscure Strongbad reference).
Use my cell phone number to get in touch with me in the meantime.
Update 2: so it looks like it’s back up again. No explanation of what was going on. Might I add, I posted this initial notice at around 5pm, and it took another one and a half hours to get a notice up on the status page (which didn’t have any more information, and is simply listed as "resolved"). The call center techs weren’t too pleased about it either — Patricia H. acknowledged that they knew that many (if not most) of their customers were themselves technically savvy, and that their instinctive reaction was to go check things out online.
For me, I had recently fiddled with some network settings on my router, so I spent a bunch of time tearing apart my network and trying to figure out what was going on. Only to have tech support tell me that yes, the network had problems.
The lesson? Give your tech support people access to a tool that allows them to post updates themselves, instead of waiting for some other department to do it for them. Oh ya — I’d also subscribe to an RSS feed of network status for my broadband provider, cellphone provider, and VoIP provider.
layout: post title: "Links of Interest: December 12, 2004" created: 1103349462 categories:
These are my links of interest, remaindered links, link-list, whatever you want to call it. They’ve been sitting as open tabs in NNW for far too long. Which leads to a request: a script for NNW that takes all the open tabs and pastes the link for them into a new post in the associated blog editor.
Phew! That felt good. Safely stored in my backup brain, so I can forget about them.
layout: post title: "Links of Interest: March 20, 2004" created: 1111379049 categories:
I don’t do these very often, but I really do need to point a handful of things out before they age too much:
I don’t think I need to say anything about Flickr being acquired by Yahoo. I’ll say something including more Y!s over on the company blog.
And like that, two weeks have passed since I last wrote here. I started four or five posts in the meantime, but none made it out of draft. Work has been busy, so I end up taking work home, and then I run out of time for some things — like writing here.
I was able to get other stuff done this weekend, though, so that was great. I studied ML, paid some bills, played the piano, played games with L. We also cooked a curry and baked a cake. We didn’t leave the flat except for taking out the garbage. The most beautiful weekends sometimes don’t make for very exciting blog posts, perhaps, but that’s alright.
It was a bit weird posting that last thing about GPT-2. It’s probably the thing most closely resembling an article that I’ve written outside of work in many years. Reading it back, I spot so many issues — mainly lack of critical thinking as applied to the possible developments of the field that I mentioned. There’s so many things that could go wrong as the story progresses; both scientifically (dead ends) or ethically. But it was lots of fun writing the piece as it is. I could make a hobby of writing this kind of thing; I think as I study more ML I should be able to write more interesting things about the subject, hopefully addressing the pitfalls in my writing I mentioned (and others I’ve yet to find) as I go. I sort of am looking forward to that.
I think I should be "done" with my 50000 feet introduction to ML in a few weeks, and be able to move on to a 10000 feet review of some of the more interesting or promising subtopics I have spotted. Natural Language Processing could be one of them.
Whoa, there go 15 days without posting. It’s funny, how many times have I run into random abandoned blogs where the last few posts begin like this post? I wonder if I’ll quit anytime soon. I don’t feel like quitting really, I’ve just been busy with other things. Let’s wait and see :)
I wrote several things that I thought of posting, then didn’t because I felt they needed work. It’s funny — I don’t really have any regular readers, I think, so it doesn’t make an immediate difference whether I post what I write straight away (and perhaps edit it live) or postpone publishing until I’ve "polished" it (which realistically may never happen).
I feel like I mostly write for archive.org; what I write could end up persisting there, and might be read many years from now. This train of thought led me to write one of the pieces I mentioned. I will probably clean it up a bit and post it after finishing this entry (but then again, maybe not).
Going back to the 15 day long hiatus: I’ve been busy with several things related to Machine Learning — and, to put it succinctly, that makes me happy.
I have this fuzzy long-term plan to learn it well, and a more tactical approach that consists in just keeping an eye out for reasonable opportunities to apply what I’ve learnt hands-on. Now I’ve finally found a project at work that could benefit from ML, so I’ve put aside some of my time to experiment with it. Everything is taking long, as it’s usually the case with programming (for me, anyway), but I really enjoy the process so for once I don’t really mind. It’s such a nice change; I don’t really feel this way about my day job, usually. I don’t think I’ve felt this way about something technical since I was in university.
I’ve also read papers that I found stimulating:
I’ve probably spent 35h over the last three weeks doing ML, and if I remember correctly I’ve enjoyed all of it. Overall I reckon I’ve probably put 100 hours into learning ML in all formats (Coursera and podcasts included) since I started.
Going by the now contended 10000 hours rule of thumb — I have 9900 hours to go.

I just wrote a big ol’ blog post about [[indiewebifying my event discovery and RSVPs]]. Thinking about it just now, however, it’s a bit of a mish-mash between why I wanted to do it, and how I did it.
For someone coming to the post who is new to the IndieWeb, it’s probably bit off-putting (and maybe fuel for the fire of ‘IndieWeb is too complicated’). And for someone who already knows about the IndieWeb, but isn’t using WordPress, they might skip over the hows and in the process miss some of the whys.
So in future I might try and split these kinds of articles into two - a ‘why’ post, and a ‘how I did it’ post. The ‘why’ post will kind of be my [[behaviour-driven development]] specs, so to speak, and probably mostly links to various pattern pages on the IndieWeb wiki. And the ‘how’ post will get into the weeds of one very specific implementation, liberally referring back to the ‘why’ post.
I think that would work well and make the articles a bit more reusable and less niche.
Been doing a small bit of wiki gardening on my [[books]] pages today. Nothing major, just starting to link the different ideas from different books to the concepts they’re discussing.
I really like how Nadia Eghbal‘s writings are peppered with cultural references. When I’m getting to the point where I’m writing longer-form articles on an idea, I would like them to have a similar cross-pollination vibe. Like Mark Fisher, too.
[[org-roam]] has a nice feature that lets you graph the notes in your wiki and the links between them. I just saw that there’s a pull request to produce that map for the current note.
When that lands, I’d like to try and hook up my [[publish]] step to add the note-specific graph to each published page. That’d give a navigation path something like the one in [[FedWiki]]:
Though I would still want my own curated [[paths]] in addition to this generated map o’ everything.
Fairly high-level intro to [[org-roam]], and why you might want to use it instead of Roam (and also why you might not).
The [[Roam]] approach to [[note-taking]] is to start with your daily page, and then link to things from there. This makes a lot of sense to me, and fits in with my [[current process]] for the [[blog and wiki combo]].
You just start with whatever is currently on your mind, and that goes in the stream, but links out to things in the wiki. I tend to copy it into the wiki at the same time, too, if it makes sense. Probably one thing to think about though is what in the stream do I want to be [[public versus private]] - that would change the workflow a bit.
[[Surveillance technology]] such as [[contact tracing]] is being rolled out to track [[coronavirus]], by delightful companies such as [[Palantir]].
Rather than contracting profiteering [[disaster capitalists]] to roll out technologies of dubious efficacy and inherent [[racial biases]], it would be better to invest in reforms that build social safety nets and reduce structural inequality.
Pouring funding into technology that can detect COVID infection from vocal signatures, doesn’t provide the social safety nets that allow people to take time off from work when they are ill.
In reply to: https://twitter.com/MentalNodes/status/1261010969230270470
There is git for projects—should we have git for ideas?
I’m hoping that at some point I’ll be able to use the version history of my [[wiki]] to turn the evolution of my [[graph]] into a nice timelapse animation – I think that would be a really fun visualisation, to see it grow and morph over time, new links forming, new clusters.
I got myself a little [[hyper://]] profile via [[Beaker Browser]], after seeing [[Kicks]] post his hyper link. (I tried it a little before when it was [[dat]] but Beaker had a bug that made it unusable for me on Linux…)
I am: hyper://9f711600ba98dd6013aed1689dff47655ddedd360aee74fd151ee91fa7f70206/
Dunno how far I’ll go with that (I mainly just want to mess around with Duxtape when it is up again!), but I do like the notion of sites and apps hosted straight from the browser, removing the server from the equation. It feels like it could be democratising (in some future world where it’s not pitched at ‘web hackers’).
A fully forkable read/write web is a solid aim too.
Though I don’t think this is really a goal of Beaker, I am also totally a fan of the idea of sites sometimes just not being online. Like low-tech magazine’s [[solar-powered website]].
more time in college is important! moe opportunities, the potential to work real jobs, and more time for internships and the like.
I am concerned that a lot of computer systems research is solving problems that only huge tech companies have (eg. fast datacenter networking, big data analytics systems), rather than working on technologies that empower individual users and the underprivileged.
Martin does research into [[CRDTs]], which actively try to shift power from cloud services and back towards end users.
I’ve been re-reading Ink & Switch’s article on [[local-first software]]. (Possibly related to me currently being in the middle of the Lake District with patchy connectivity…). It really is a great read, I highly recommend it if you’re interested in distributed systems, and if you’re interested in the issue of ownership of data and [[digital self-determination]].
Cloud apps are a bit like supply chains. In the sense that we have little agency over the things we use or create. We are removed from the production of the things that we use. A supply chain being disrupted is like a cloud app going down. We have no local means to support ourselves.
Like [[appropriate technology]], but for specifically for digital services (mainly software). Dan Hind talks about something like it in his interview on Tech Won’t Save Us.
First chapter focused mainly on some of the problems with the [[social industry]]. Spun slightly different than most accounts, focusing on the profligacy with which we are all writing these days. Touched on trolling, fake news, etc. Some psychoanalysis, some theory, e.g. mentions of society of the [[spectacle]].
While I don’t feel like it’s telling anything novel so far - we already know the social industry is rife with problems - Seymour’s account is an interesting take, and very urbane to boot.
see reading as a moral imperative! people died to give us the ability to read.
if you have not read widely, you are as good as someone who is not read at all. read diversely.
do not criticise without advantage
assume others know when something is wrong
quality time vs garbage time!
ordinary moments can be gifts if we appraoch them from the perspective
alive time vs dead time — sit around and wait or make every second count
some people lean in and some lean away
Years ago, in a high school English class, I shared something with my discussion group. Later, people used what I had said in their essays and presentations and got credit for it. I brought this up to the teacher, telling her that people were using my ideas. She looked at me and said, “Ryan, that’s their job.” I’m very glad she said that and that I heard it at a young age.
amateurs focus on outcomes more than processes; we should always focus on the work and know we can rely on the systems to deliver us results
there are professional habits and amateur habits; make sure you are practicing the right one
'competition is for losers'; when you compete, someone loses! run a race with yourself
Years ago, in a high school English class, I shared something with my discussion group. Later, people used what I had said in their essays and presentations and got credit for it. I brought this up to the teacher, telling her that people were using my ideas. She looked at me and said, “Ryan, that’s their job.” I’m very glad she said that and that I heard it at a young age. i don't know how to explain that you should care about other people
ask the best questions. questions are what separate us from others, not answers
what do you do with your money?
production and peace are very different and cannot be compared
choose what will teach you the most, not what will pay you a most. make sure you choose opportunities that you will learn the most from and take the most out of
put your precepts up for display! make your commitments public so that they will be honored
no man steps in the same river twice - heraclitus
your last book won't write your next one
run rates always start at zero
former Coca-Cola CEO Brian Dyson: “Imagine life as a game in which you are juggling some five balls in the air. You name them — work, family, health, friends, and spirit… and you’re keeping all of these in the air. You will soon understand that work is a rubber ball. If you drop it, it will bounce back. But the other four balls — family, health, friends, and spirit — are made of glass. If you drop one of these, they will be irrevocably scuffed, marked, nicked, damaged, or even shattered. They will never be the same.”
there is no party line for what you should and should not do
do not feel obligated to do anything with your money
feel free to just not reply to things selectively ignoring is the key to productivity do not feel obligated to entertain everyone
sometimes you can just take a break
i learn more every day man make sure your work helps you learn every action takes some mentral weight
blame! one piece akira (check it out!) bleach beginning and art (but not story……)
http://email.mg.buttondown.email/c/eJyNTstuhDAM_BpyS5QnIYccti39jZUh3g1tgApSUP—yV4q9bSSbY3tmdEE36HlypLJSy654FzWKSwTzL5a8eJsL_reuDdzaTSf72z4znldwnouDGeYEom-SowU2EmrjROj1la1QjpseRChsyT5mPPX3qhLI99L_fcopzilhOmEnwXLBtsYp6OiEzekAwQKme6113TgtpcP2fwHfOIYD8iQSrh7tWLjOpPssR1bY0xHB367Ua0C0EF2ljrAoFGhAiPIX4zrI8Z1Cs8JH-ynqL8LVGqg
semidefinite programming
famous np complete problem: must find satisfying formula for the boolean varaibles and statement for sanity we format the statement to assume conjunctive normal form find assignment that satisfies the equation
all np-complete problems can be converted to 3-sat problem sat solvers can quickly solve problems with lots of variables! this is mostly used for dependency management. but how do you prove a transition from your problem into sat?
aside: cleverness is communicated in a domain with experience, but can be transferred
posits that cleverness is only necessary with a lack of communication
smt community -> off of sat -> puts effort into affordances
I just reinstalled [[koreader]] on my [[kobo]] ereader. It’s come on so much since last time I used it (a year or two ago?) The fact that it’s a built-in menu in Nickel (Kobo’s default system) makes it so much easier to launch.
Dark mode is so nice. And now it has its own [[Wallabag]] plugin, for reading articles you’ve saved online, which is awesome. (I was using Wallabako, which was cool but no longer needed).
My notes here: [[Installing koreader on my Kobo]].
Listening to the FOSS and Crafts episode on [[an ethics of agency]], Chris Webber’s ethical framework. Liking it so far, and the links to the recent [[Declaration of Digital Autonomy]].
https://fossandcrafts.org/episodes/11-an-ethics-of-agency.html
src In distributed organizations, everyone can have a 'corner office' - a space that they own. there is so much more you can do in terms of space management when you define the office; and you can choose to define your office as the space you feel that you will be most productive in!
This blog might be relevant for future work, it's written by the creator of Wordpress.
https://linus.zone/latest control, attention and relationship how to feel in control be conscientious about where attention is. is your complete attention going in the right direction? scattered attention can quickly contribute to a sense of chaos and lead to a lack of control over work!
Do not think just of spending attention, but also of redirecting the attention you waste into things that make your time more variable and enjoyable.
When you are working on something, redirect all of yourself into it! FOcus on focus. [[]] what do we need to know to start making a difference?
ds knowledge: vocab and ontological understandign
prerequisite is vocabulary - you must speak the lnaguage to understand the ideas
ontological knowledge is so easy to pick up when you're doing the work vs relaxing format text to be scanned easily!
src What is the future of the internet? The need for global collectivity is super important; one of the biggest blockers is NAT traversal. NAT :: Network Address Translation. A mechanism used to map from one IP address space to another to redirect IP packets in transit. We must prevent every connected device from requiring a public IP, so they should be freely redirected to our own private subnetworks from our router to the local devices connected to it.
I wanted to add a 404 page to my garden, especially as I’m currently renaming pages. Might end up with some broken links.
Easy enough - I created a 404.org in org-mode. It gets published as 404.html.
And in .htaccess, just needed to add:
ErrorDocument 404 /404.html
When children attend schools that place a greater value on discipline and security than on knowledge and intellectual development, they are attending prep schools for prison.
– [[Angela Davis]]
Came across [[McKenzie Wark]] via the latest issue of [[STIR]]. Her work on the [[commodification of information]] sounds really interesting. Will have to check out [[A Hacker Manifesto]] and other works. The identification of the ‘[[Vectoralist class]]‘ back in 2003 sounds pretty on point.
this week i've realized how easy and free it is to be completely independent. it takees a bit of self control, sure, and i think everyone has work to do in that department — but thinking uncouples from home is freeing. decoupling the idea of a living space from a home, work from life and career is one necessary step towards self realization, i think. i can work independent of my expectations, of a conventional life path, of a path i want to pursue (even if it's not the most rational) and i absolutely have the means to do so. i want to live in nature! limit my access to the internet! i want to learn to treasure local, small software to better approach technology in a minimal fashion. some advice for living digital nomad full time realistically, even when overpaying for airbnbs for rent month by month, finances often end up less expensive than establishing oneself in a large city. not having to keep things and enjoying the living spaces of others is a blessing, not a curse; one gets to enjoy how other people live their lives, to change their environments without defining themselves, and to learn from the choices of others — letting external factors define their lifestyle. in a digitally connected and homogenous society, we simply don't have access to this anymore.
after seeing a post from tiffany day this never really occured to me as something i can or should be interested in.
lol candy bad no need to question originality there's never any pressure to know all of the answers conclusions aren't the answer, sometimes it's the thought process itself that matters — drawn back to the endless conversation about dsl for mtg game between dustin and i that never took off, but lead to a lot of valuable conversations about semantics
Escucharé la [[Lecture 03: Structuralism in Anthropology and Literature]]
things to do with your time instead of looking at bullshit on social media :a reminder record audio for librivox reading audiobooks add data to open street map! code; work on one of many personal projects you have going on organize wiki; refine language, make it more presentable, etc. read a book : ) or a paper you've shelved for the moment. lots of textbooks to read, not enough time
stateful: file descriptors must always be opened before reading or writing them, but this is all tracked internal to the kernel rather than externally; this measn that things can't be done asynchronously
the posix io model causes the cost of opening a file to scale linearly with the number of requests in userland requesting the opening, even on parallel file systems!
prescribing metadata doesn't seem all that bad… their point is that files are all kept track of independently but still must maintain the same standards. this cannot adapt to additional metadata information we want to store
isn't it fine to just use extra files to denote additional specs? you can use the format of the file to carry that additional information, or manage it in other files as metadata. perhaps another system may want to track extra information… in this case, the separation is not quite ideal, but this does not seem like a significant issue
semantics: after a write, each read returns the data specified by the previous write until the next write. this means that a write is required to block execution until a read call will produce the result from that write, which is grossly inneficient for async systems - but it provides strong guarantees to those systems, and without this guarantee you'd have to check back to see if the file was updated when monitoring files
reduces consistency to a single node relaxes stateful requirements of parallel data
i don't think this article was quite meant for my work - in my world, the POSIX guarantees provided are better than alternatives. they're standards that provide guarantees I do think that certain technologies - synchronous requirements for linting, for example - that I use could be done asynchronously more effectively, but the real solution here is not to serialize out to files at all. programming shouldn't be about the file, it should be about the program!
microkernels may not be the way to go for consumer software; plan9's kernel is much smaller than the linux kernel or any distributed system. [perhaps a monolithic kernel isn't the best for abstraction, but it offers much more compact functionality and better performance]
unix as an application program? seems like an emulation layer that's way too difficult to approach
enabling RPC but leaving it to the user to implement is silly and terrible. having to implement RPC standards for every userland program ruins the consistency of the system and any power necessary to maintain it
async is not the answer to synchronous inneficiencies. they solve different problems!
new languages are needed — they say no, but 29 years later i think the answer is an obvious yes — it's the lack of programming language development and higher level features, particularly in systems programming, that has hurt the user of such programs. languages like rust have carried a lot of the systems programming development, though its fixation with the imperfect LLVM
distributed shared memory diss - i kind of agree
if you have a good process model, you can ignore all of these process/thread distinctions and substantially simplify the machine. having both is a substantial flaw.
the user system was designed to protect the system from users rather than protecting users from malicious software, as is more often the case today. there are mitigations - 'hacks' like running each program 'in a container' with an isolated file system and new user, but this is a stopgap measure. proper single user environments should see real implementations; we don't share computers or systems as much as someone computing before the 80s would anticipate
cool video from leonard pottering— making the user's data independent from the operating system means that you don't have to worry about reinstalling over it.
config files need better and improved standards
a standard way of parsing and returning command line inputs! if you standardize that in the kernel, then user programs trivially have to support identical interfaces! [there isn't that much space for creativity on the command line anyways…]
shifting responsibility to things the user can't modify to guarantee consistency is excellent when done right - that is, when it's clear that there is a solution that will be liked or at least generally accepted. see the amigaos docsand command line standards document
look into the selinux/apparmor permissions systems, just like what's implemented in android. these properly 'fix' the mermissions we have in mainline linux systems
cool things about languages:
nim: completely c interoperable; nimscript handles a lot
zig: lightweight and memory safe
rust: takes a significant amount of time to learn, a bit bloated, but a powerhouse and a joy to program in — particularly functionally
the obvious one: why is piping plain text in and out the basis for an operating system? did ken thompson hate OO that much? microkernels are just better for software though, right?
learn more about redox; it will be beneficial for the future https://doc.redox-os.org/book/ch01-05-why-redox.html Operating Systems https://scattered-thoughts.net/writing/assorted-thoughts-on-zig-and-rust/ zig seems significantly easier to learn than rust while offering similar security, for the most part. it also seems to offer some ml style power, albeit without the syntax
zig compilation is lazy, has very good support for cross-compilation. cool build system that differs from cargo and allows for the creation of arbitrary build systems
zig has much lower cognitive overhead than rust, and seems better for faster development speed, but it doesnt have a good method for uaf escalation, data races, data sharing etc. rust lifetimes are cool and so are traits, but zig might have the facilities to implement them
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferno_(operating_system) sequel to plan9 - it even runs as a userspace application inside of the plan9 operating system. the fact that it provides an inbuilt virtual os is incredible. try this one out sometime when you want to learn more about os research. on android though? on nintendo ds????
what's wrong with fork? some research:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2019/04/fork-hotos19.pdf
https://drewdevault.com/2018/01/02/The-case-against-fork.html the OOM killer…….. KnightOS? the spawn model, in which a new process is created and kept in limbo, then you can change its environment, pass it more file descriptors, and so forth until you're ready for the process to actually begin
TIL you can use dashes for bullets, I’ve been using asterisks.
Pushed the [[agora]] browser extension to public repo
Tempted to move my private notes into another system, I’m kinda tired of managing two repos. Maybe obsidian can do that bit for me
Thinking about if I want to start using a feed reader or if fedi is enough
TIL ¤ is unicode for "generic currency symbol"
Woke up later than I was meaning to.
I wish there was a better [[roam-like]] for mobile. I’m using [[GitJournal]] and it’s a little too limited.
My msg on [[fedi]] got a bunch of likes
A bunch of intellectual types started following me on [[twitter]] recently
Been talking to my friend Grace about [[dmt]] and the nature of reality. We got stoned on her [[volcano]] the other night and listened to [[Terrance McKenna]] talks on YouTube
TIL [[git]] comes with examples for [[git hooks]] in .git/hooks for every new repo you initialize
It doesn’t look like [[agora]] currently supports triple-tick format, I’m not sure the proper name for it
Started using [[hypothes.is]] to comment on nodes in the [[agora]], I’m mostly just writing comments on flancians dailys
Was just checking out https://beepb00p.xyz/blog-graph.html interesting to see blog as a graph very [[roam-like]]
checking out [[dendron]] It’s a [[vscode]] extension like [[foam]]
reading about [[ditherpunk]]
reading about [[ontic structural realism]]
The [[daily note]] idea is interesting because the bounds of the "note entity" are not set by the content of the note but instead by an external celestial cycle, planets orbiting stars is literally what determines the start and end of my files. That’s pretty nuts
Talking to my friend about some of the frustrations of both [[matrix]] and [[xmpp]]
turns out the [[matrix]] homeserver was just needing to be restarted. software as a service is so finicky
found [[simplecss]]
my friend [[shae]] showed me a video about geometry in higher dimensions
With Trump being kicked off Twitter, the discussion about Parler being kicked off [[AWS]], there’s lots of discusison about federated and censorship proof social networks.
I got drawn into a long thread [kicked off by Stefan George](https://twitter.com/StefanDGeorge/status/1347861734716035074 ) of [[Gnosis]], who wanted to post a bounty to save/store Twitter stuff to IPFS. I [pointed out that Twitter archives already exist](https://twitter.com/bmann/status/1347937473494618112 ?s=20).
From there I got into a whole back and forth, including people suggesting that Twitter data should be mass exfiltrated to setup an alt social network. Maybe at one point I would have reached for a purely technical solution like this, but here’s my final take:
Technical tricks to try extract Twitter data is probably orders of magnitude harder than …just doing the work in building out critical mass communities.
The difference between the two approaches? One is technical challenges, the other is marketing and community building. [@bmann](https://twitter.com/bmann/status/1348350579072921605 )
I am… somewhat distraught that a lot of decentral type people think about this issue as censorship, rather than the "let’s deplatform fascists issue" that it actually is. Twitter is in no way a public utility. Own your "distribution" — whether it’s direct mailing list subscriptions or your own community social network: run your own Discourse or Mastodon server. Twitter is today’s mass media: use it for distribution, but know that you’re there at the company’s sufferance.
And of course, when I see lots of crypto people happily using Medium and Substack, I’m not going to take the rest of their opinions seriously. Your words need to get backed up by actions, my dudes.
Jeff Henshaw popped back up on Mastodon — and he’s hosting his own Mastodon server. He was asking me why I’m on Mastodon, here’s my answer:
the concept of collective ownership / maintenance.
Nothing wrong with “multi user” systems, but we have to clearly understand that it costs people time and some server resources to run things.
I’m working on a model of awareness that people should pay for apps — that behind that app are real people, not just corporations.
“Exit to community” is a related theme. Plus governance, etc etc @bmann@social.coop
Yes, I’m posting my own content back to my own site. Which means it becomes part of my forever content, and also I can link to and include it in search.
I guess I should document my [[Twitter Archive]], which lives at https://tweets.bmannconsulting.com/. In a week or so, when [[Fission]] has [[Github Actions]] support, I can start publishing this to [[IPFS]] directly, instead of hosting it on Github Pages. Doing this direct from Google Sheets to Fission would be ideal, as a little one off Twitter Archive app.
It was really easy to setup. Michael Hawksey’s @mhawksey post explains it all: [[Keeping your Twitter Archive fresh and freely hosted on Github Pages]].
I just emailed Michael to see if I can send him some thank you money, or donate to some project on his behalf.
Kautsky believed that imperialism would gradually move to a period where imperialist powers would exploit the third world collectively rather than competitively and individually. This is why Lenin called his book on imperialism "the highest stage of capitalism", because he rejected the idea that capitalism would move into a new era of imperialism. History shows that Kautsky was correct, though. (link
Hello world. Today I decided to try out agora. I heard about it from this toot on mastodon from [[readme@flancian]].
Really enjoyed the [[When Preston Meets the Doughnut]] webinar. Inspiring to hear more about what’s going on in [[Preston]], and to see how Kate Raworth has been working on adaptations of [[Doughnut Economics]] to the city-level.
"absolute knowledge is a permanent agenda"
indeed, the construction of society is a permanent agenda
Worked on [[agora server]] yesterday. Made som decent progress on a [[svelte]] frontend.
Saw this article, makes me think of [[Mike Caulfield]]‘s work on [[misinformation]] and the importance of [[web literacy]].
John became increasingly radicalised by an online barrage of far-right disinformation. “Posts of homeless British soldiers were set against Muslim families being given free homes. Now I know the posts were all fake, but the 15-year-old me didn’t bother to fact-check.”
– How far right uses video games and tech to lure and radicalise teenage recrui…
[[public key]]
Via Roland, Tom MacWright wonders if the future of programming is more common data types:
What if a simpler programming language had first-class representations of a lot more than strings and arrays?
But if the aim is ease of use and giving power to people who otherwise wouldn’t be doing programming, type-rich systems with lots of assumptions seem like a logical first step. And one that doesn’t need a visual editor or a new dialect of a rare programming language.
Helder is starting a public monologue channel on the Fission Discourse. Monologue channels are something we developed for Fission’s internal Discord chat spaces that seem to have worked out well for people, so Helder is trying it in public.
It’s been fun to evolve how we work as a distributed team.
Woo hoo! I am so stoked!
I now have this site auto-publishing using [[Github Actions for Jekyll]], with a [[Fission Publish]] Github Action at the end.
I used the nicely commented limjh16/jekyll-action-ts and then just added fission publish at the end.
Main thing I need to do to complete the rollout of these new journal logs — other than pagination — is to truncate long posts and strip HTML from them.
For short posts, I should not truncate, and actually render markdown.
Probably something like, if the content is bigger than 500 characters, strip_html and show 250 chars with a read more link. If less than 500, display the content.
For reference, this post is about 480 characters without HTML tags.
watched some movies and tv (jojo - anime, american psycho, office space)
relaxed and reflected on what i wanted my priorities to be
sorted out some of my possessions
started a workout regimen
continue working on my wiki - finding a way to make the main page great!
revise some of my wiki pages to make sure that it's fit for formatting
edit some photos
start to write and publish reviews!
attend career fair (or at least check it out)
An open source [[Drop in Audio]] server. User logins are via Twitter or GitHub account. Built in [[Elixir]] and [[React]].
Built by @benawad
Brave Browser bought a search engine, “promises no tracking, no profiling – and may even offer a paid-for, no-ad version”.
Good timing for clearing my tabs of other [[Brave]] related stuff. This PDF white paper describes the Brave Search Team’s plans — [[Goggles]]:
This paper proposes an open and collaborative system by which a community, or a single user, can create sets of rules and filters, called Goggles, to define the space which a search engine can pull results from. Instead of a single ranking algorithm, we could have as many as needed, overcoming the biases that a single actor (the search engine) embeds into the results.
via Daring Fireball
Can’t quite put my finger on why, but having my garden [[publish automatically]] has given me a bit of a kick to note in it more often again. And also tweak it a bit more often.
I guess it removed some friction. For me it’s generally good to remove as much friction as possible, when it comes to writing and publishing (even tiny things).
For work purposes, I’m recently using my [[org-mode]] and [[org-roam]] as a kind of dashboard - shortcuts to the various Jira views, Google Docs, etc, that I need to work on. So I don’t bookmark them in my browser, I just flip to the right page in org-roam and hit enter on the link to where I need to go.
Open source database designed to be an [[Airtable]] alternative. [[MIT License]], with SaaS and premium versions available.
Sells Intel [[NUC]] mini-PCs — which are basically like a Mac Mini.
I’m exploring [[SSG]]s again, and trying out [[GitLab Pages]] for the first time. Now that I’m helping to run [[Moa Party]], I’m going to make a static site for it, for status updates and documentation and so on.
[[Hugo]] I’ve used a bit, because [[Micro.blog]] uses it, so to make a custom theme, I installed it locally for testing.
[[Zola]] is a [[Rust]]-based SSG. I haven’t really had any personal experience with Rust, but I’m very interested in it, especially because Rust is very commonly used to compile to [[WebAssembly]].
There is a page documenting Zola with GitLab pages. The mention of git submodules is not comforting.1
OK, Zola experiment over. I used the Juice theme and got Zola running and it is nice and fast. But — I want to maintain this as a docs site using [[wikilinks]], likely also being compatible with [[Obsidian]] as an editor. I know [[Jekyll]] best so I’ll just use that.
Started created a blank Jekyll site, and briefly wanted to make a "status" type like my journal logs here, but really just can keep it simple for now. Saving my fragments of setup for this here in case I want to come back to it.
- scope:
path: "_status/*"
type: status
values:
layout: status
collections:
status:
output: true
permalink: /status/:year/:month/:day/
Well, that ended up being an epic build out of a full [[Jekyll]] site. I went back and used the [[Digital Garden Jekyll Template]]. It is a lot slimmer than the [[Simply Jekyll]] theme I use here, which has me itching to tinker some more.
I’m pretty happy with how the site turned out: https://moaparty.com
Everyone, including myself, thinks that git submodules is a good idea, until actually working with them in practice for any period of time. ↩
You can’t separate the software from the community that built it. Therefore, true openness must dictate how that community is formed and run. We are what we choose to tolerate; in the same way that free software communities do not tolerate proprietary lock-in, they should not tolerate exclusionary social practices that lock people out.
Kevin Drum: Why have blog audiences declined over the past decade?
Short (theoretical) answer: RSS impacts the insertion of advertising.
org-id-extra-files in his export process. This could help me [[Preparing for org-roam v2]].[[rebus principle]]
it's often hard to realize or rationalize, but it's impossile to build the perfect tool outright. the perfect tool is only built over many iterations and trials; it's important to continue to iterate, rather
trends are cast over shorter time periods than we account for. when working with data, it's often risky to extrapolate with just two or four data points; with human behavior, these trends are often both pointed out and lost.
It’s that part of the day where I force myself to write a daly note. There. Done. Mission accomplished lol
Oh yeah, I went all the way to fuckin [[hood river]] to get my [[single dose vaccine]] and the fuckin [[FDA]] recalled it the same day. I’m so pissed. This corona thing is such a nightmare. Just end already
playing with new software for [[android]]
Green vs Brown Programming Languages:
but I distinctly remember Ruby being the hottest language back in 2007, and although it does have more competition today, Ruby is a better language now than it was then. Yet now it is dreaded. Part of the difference, it seems to me, is that now people have 14 years’ worth of rails apps to maintain. That makes Ruby is a lot less fun than when it was all new projects. So watch out Rust and Kotlin and Julia and Go: you too will eventually lose your halo.
TLDR — older programming languages are more likely to have older codebase (brown) which are less fun to work on. Newer languages means new projects that are about building new stuff which is fun, rather than maintenance.
src designing your space is designing your product - by shaping user interactions within that space, you control how it is experienced.
Listened: [[Rethinking infrastructure: the case for social investment]]
Pleased to be coming up with a few more [[notion]]s now. In the interests of keeping track of what I’m thinking about, as a kind of mishmash of [[speculative outline]]s, now pages, and [[Spaced repetition]], I’m going to have a make a page called (awfully) [[nowtions]], which is a list of latest notions.
[[Citizen participation platform]]s: [[Decidim]], [[Your Priorities]], [[Consul]]
Could you describe Agora as a [[citizen participation platform]] for citizens of a virtual place?
[[musicForProgramming]] mix #1 by [[Datassette]] is rad.
Stumbled on a software suite for UK town and parish councils. Managing allotments, playgrounds, cemeteries, planning, inspections, etc etc. This stuff is kind of fascinating, e.g. https://www.edgeitsystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/AdvantEDGE-Allotments.pdf
trying out [[agora clients]] again. I’ve been messing with [[joplin]] I’ve used it before, let’s see how it goes.
I got my [[covid vaccination]] finally so I’m stoked about that
I went to the doctors to get [[sti testing]] my results came back negative for everything. #testingissexy
I’m downloading a bunch of note apps to see what works on mobile. I signed up for [[notion]] [[api]] so we’ll see what happens with that
NFT dweb myspace meets minecraft https://www.cryptovoxels.com/
[[webaverse]] dweb ways creators can earn in virtual worlds ownership of their labor self ownership anti capitalist
virtual world where nft is the asset
ipfs nft, adressing
nft.storage free nft storage
artists own the copyright even when they sell their art
futherfield
async.art programable art platform
unwalled.garden -> [[ctzn]] stuff
[[hypercore]] -> dweb -> [[ctzn]] -> [[distributed press]]
there has to be a common theme here; connections
pay transaction fees for them
i don’t make stuff, I make systems: sarah
nfts offer a new model that don’t depend on [[capitalism]] and surveilence
cryptovoxel
[[flancia goals]]
Installed [[obsidian mobile]]. It’s super sexy
tackle issues in [[wikilinks everywhere]] repo
[[sablier.finance]]
[[portis wallet]]
I got verfiied for [[circles]]
Don’t try to fit in if you were born to stand out
test
Listening: [[Kate Raworth on Why Our Times Demand ‘Doughnut Economics’]]
[[Acoustic Commons]]
Acoustic Commons is dedicated to building resilient networks across sites, distributing creative technical resources and cultural know-how and contributing to the long term cultivation of knowledge commons.
read frederick beiser, a philosopher and scholar of german idealism. he has intimate knowledge of the german idealist period and is one of its leading scholars, so learning his work may be super important to understand the influence of german idealism on contemporary philosophy
who are post kantians? they're revolutionaries in practical philosophy, converting kant's idea that 'the principles of morality should be sought in human rationality and freedom', "completing" kant's revolution in practical philosophy by deepening his morality and developing kantian legal and political ideaologies
[[Tor and Wordfence]]. I use Wordfence on some sites. It seems that [[Wordfence]] blocklists certain exit nodes from [[Tor]] if it associates those nodes with bad activity. Fair enough, I guess, though a shame that Tor users get bounced as a result. If it happens to someone, they can start a new Tor circuit to find an exit node that isn’t blocklisted.
Bookmarked: [[Appropriate Measures]]. Critique of [[appropriate technology]].
[[Holochain]].

Todos vivimos exiliados de nuestros mundos ideales.
El [[copyright]] es una forma de opresión.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=TN9i9Ni0Xr4&feature=youtu.be might be a good series? would prefer a science guy to a trainer guy though
enjoy training!! you will stick to your programs better. optimizing training program is fine, but focusing on sustainability requires focusing on personal health
if you hate training might be good idea to min max time and training
variety of training is fine rather than tracking the saem things every week, and it can add interest, but ensuring that you train the same things the whole time is incredibly beneficial
different exercises with the same core movements?
most people in gym aren't pushing themselves hard enough!! don't leave most reps in the tank - 20% of trainees leaving 10 reps or more. have to push yourself to work out almost to failure
need to pack the stress on - don't leave any reps left in the tank at the end of the workout! that's what makes it a great workout!
good guideline to level up on weight: if you can do two additional reps on the same exercise at that weight during two sets of that exercise for two weeks of working out. this means you're now far too comfortable with it. always push yourself!!!
failure sets are great for isolation work but not for multiple joint movements that could impair other exercises and impact other training programs.
track number of workign sets. total work: about sets x reps x load number of working sets - tough sets, without warmups - properly measure the number of working sets and should counrt towards the training volume i was right about this guy being a total gym bro. he's spent ten minutes pointing at a graph that has volume on the x axis and gains on the y axis, explaining how you have to increase volume to increase gains over this hump, and what he's saying really doesn't line up with the graph at all, because it depicts gains decreasing at some level and he's advocating for people to push towards that. lots of acronyms i'm sure he's come up wiuth that dont mean anything…………….this is a bit of a joke. i like the heuristics and numbers this guy provides but those are useful only because it's better to have some arbitrary heuristic to follow over nothing. all really questions for measuring strength - though at end of the day all that matters is that you're applying appropriate effort from the outset.
this is what i love about the gym. effort you put in is effort you can seriously feel through this natural feedback solution. coding has all of these strange side effects that cause physical fatigue instead of the coding - take eye strain, back pain and RSI for example!
most workout advice on the internet is (as expectd) very poor. don't trust most or all of it. just try to work out every muscle group, push yourself to your limit, and feel good while doing so. that's the best way to build a strong foundation.
it's still not clear to me what i should do where, when and why. halfassing a neovim configuration provides no value to anyone, and it's unclear whether porting mine over is even worthwhile, but i feel like i have to carry on with it because it's practically done and it was on my list.
maybe sticking to a todo list despire a lack of motivation is very helpful for keeping my priorities straight, maybe it isn't. enthusiasm is hard to measure, track, and maintain, especially when working on projects with long time scales. it's often hard for me to see what the right decision, level of dedication or measure of effort is to invest into a task, so i will go all or nothing.
i think most of this is a result of being overstimulated - overexposed to loads of information i can't absorb at my own pace, because social networks set the pace instead. i should write more about how unhealthy social networks are but i feel like i've leveraged instagram very well - though what real connections has it lead to? regardless, i'll keep up my posting regimen to ensure that i'm holding myself accountable in terms of my creative goals - three posts a week no matter what.
there are too many places to go and too many things to do but i know i need to just focus on one or a few. i'm a good software engineer and i should continue to hone that skill. what else?


Reading: [[The Left Hand of Darkness]]
Listened: [[Restart Radio: Our 2021 Summer Reading List]]
Read: [[The UK’s new ‘right to repair’ is not a right to repair]]
Interesting to learn that [[Niklas Luhmann]] (of [[zettelkasten]] fame) had some work in the area of [[second-order cybernetics]] and [[autopoesis]].
In the process of setting up on the new box, I’ve been pushed into setting up [[org-roam v2]]. It seems v2 has been made the default version of org-roam now. Fair bit of yak-shaving to get things working again, hey ho.
[[Podcasts]] I like.




[[Digital gardens and systems thinking]]
Watched [[Pan’s Labyrinth]] (again).
Listened: [[Ray Ison and Ed Straw, "The Hidden Power of Systems Thinking: Governance in a Climate Emergency"]]
I’ve come across quite a few books recently that make a connection between leftist politics, climate change and one or multiple of [[complexity science]], [[complex systems]], [[cybernetics]], and [[systems thinking]].
What is the common thread of all of these?
And @lollonero just shared [[Komplexität «Chaostheorie» und die Linke]]. Not translated yet but according to lollonero it is about how the left should catch up to complexity science.
Hmm, I wonder if you could take the simple idea of the doughnut from Doughtnut Economics and use it as a frame for a viable system that is somewhere in between horizontal and vertical organisation. The hole being disorganised individualism, the overshoot outside the perimeter being too much central authority. The tasty bit in the middle being a viable system that balances autonomy and purposeful direction for the movement.
Noded: [[bolo’bolo]]
[[The Red Army Faction: Marxist Guerrilla Warfare in West Germany]]
Listening: [[After Geoengineering: Carbon Removal and Social Transformation]]
[michael parenti]: ../pages/michael parenti.md "michael parenti" [//end]: # "Autogenerated link references"
I think the huge thing missing from [[org-mode]] in general is multiuser collaboration. Hoping someone picks up [[CRDTs]] (https://www.inkandswitch.com/local-first/) and applies it to org :D
[[vera]] is comparing [[FedWiki]] and [[Agora]] here: http://vera.wiki.anagora.org/view/comparing-fedwiki-and-agora
[[Node kata]].
[[Twitter]] knows it’s spreading right-wing lies.
Twitter released internal research showing it “amplifies more tweets from rightwing politicians and news outlets than content from leftwing sources.” That’s something anyone paying attention has known for a while, but I guess it’s good to see the platform at least admit it
So yes, it’s good to have proof of something we’ve known for a while, but don’t give Twitter too much credit when it’s still amplifying right-wing content and its CEO is not only complicit, but pushing right-wing trash of his own
[[Metaverse]]
[[Labour under Keir Starmer]] sucks.
[[Big tech]] relies on the victims of economic collapse.
Bookmark: [[The climate crisis is global, but councils can offer local solutions]]
creating first entry at midnight because I have clinical [[OCD]]
talked
[https://hapgood.us/2015/10/17/the-garden-and-the-stream-a-technopastoral/ the garden and the stream]
visited my first [[sunday pioneers]] meeting
We watched [[V for Vendetta]], a good one ready for Bonfire Night.
Reading [[Towards a Liberatory Technology]] because I’m noding [[Liberatory technology]] for [[node club]].
[[Luddites]]
If [the Luddites] had their way we wouldn’t be living in a world with ‘no technology’, we’d be living in a world where communities have a say in the technological decisions that will impact them. – Why the Luddites Matter | LibrarianShipwreck
[[dweb 2021-11-04]]
Updated spacemacs to latest on develop branch. Updated packages. Nothing seems broken (yet…)
(org-roam) Upgrading the Org-roam database from version 17 to version 18
Process emacsql-sqlite<2> not runningIt feels faster but wonder if I’m just imagining it.
This quote about [[Anarchism and right to repair]] caught my eye.
Anarchists often get caught up in the world of ideas, but right to repair gives us a chance to engage practically and I’d encourage all of us to get involved.
Interesting to note that [[Heinz von Foerster]] and [[Francisco Varela]] pop up in the acknowledgements for [[Tools for Conviviality]].
Updated to [[YunoHost]] 4.3.
Missing credentials error.Listened: [[Immediatism: 690 Debord, Ressentiment, & Revolutionary Anarchism, by Aragorn!]]
Listened: [[Immediatism: 691 Preface to The Society of the Spectacle, by Ken Knabb]]
[[openEngiadina]]
Read: [[The Knowledge Ecology]]
Noding [[digital commons]] for [[node club]]. To get a better picture of what people think that phrase specifically means.
well, i’m back once again. this is one of the only outlets i have to write my feelings out on, at the moment.
my discord account got disabled for 0 reason. this means that most "vent" channels i could have access to are no longer accessible because well, i can’t access discord. so this place might actually get use again for the next few days.
to recap, on the 10th, some people started seeing my messages as "spam" - i initially thought "that’s funny", laughed, and moved on. 2 days later, i received an email proclaiming my account had been disabled for "spam and/or platform abuse". "oh, i have other accounts i can use though," i thought. little did i know how easy it was to also get accounts locked, with phone verification required. since i had my phone number on my main account which was now banned, discord also blacklisted my phone number from use on any other accounts.
i have contacted discord support and am just waiting for a response from them, my hopes are not super high. and in general i’m pissed. i am potentially losing 5 years of my life, most if not all of my friends, to a simple "flag" on my account and it sucks. i am trying to keep my head up but it’s hard when a platform treats you as an enemy from the start.
as a sidenote, i created a telegram account under @iamtilda - if you need to make contact with me, this is probably the best way at the moment besides twitter or osu!.
i also want to tackle why i’ve been so inactive in using this agora. i think i mostly got demotivated because i wrote the same things every day, having done the same things every day for a while now. so i think i might try and do new things every day now. if i think about it, discord was really holding me back, a procrastination tool disguised as a communications platform.
so, yes, you will probably see more entries in the coming days. hopefully i can keep myself to it.
source :: cite:not_one_man_not_one_penny
tags :: GermanyGerman Social Democratic PartyKarl Kautskyhistory of socialism
The SPD (Sozialdemkratische Partei Deutschlands) was the first working-class party in the history of the world
The SPD was the first large party to try and work out the writings of Marxand Engels
SPD was the model for world socialist movement
Steenson asserts that German social democracywas just one interpretation of Marx, like the Soviet Unionwas
German social democracy also cannot simply be called Marxism
Socialists were often barred from other forms of association, which partially explains why the SPD was so all-encompassing
German social democracy has its origins in the Revolutions of 1848
There was a feeing that the cause for workers had been betrayed
The revolutionaries had failed to come up with a unified German state
Workers felt that an alliance with the bourgeois liberals could not get them what they wanted
After 1848 workplaces began educating workers via educational associations, and overall workers became more educated
Steenson says there were three remarkable things about these associations:
There was a major expansion of them after the revolution
They were politicized, especially those associated with radicals
See: Stephan Born
In August of 1848 the General German Workers' Brotherhood (Allgemeine deutsche Aerbeiterverbrüderung) was formed. It had its own newspaper, called Verbrüderung
Thought to have ~18,000 members in 1850
These organizations were very political, unlike the prior existing order which was traditionally apolitical
After the revolution they were met with a wave of reaction, and worker's associations that extended beyond their own localities became illegal in some areas
Until the 1860s there were times where workers would make alliances with liberals generally
The liberals were in conflict with the Prussian aristocracy, and were divided among themselves, and some factions recognized the need to work with labor
Prussia did not have a large industrial proletariat at this time
The workers, generally class conscious realized that the bourgeoisie were their enemy broadly
The 1860s saw the formation of the first working class political party in German history: the Allgemeiner deutscher Arbeiterverein (ADAV) ([[file:../20210131230029-general_german_workers_association.org][General German Workers' Association]])
One of the founders of the ADAV was Ferdinand Lassalle
He left two legacies to German social democracy:
Insistence on general adult male sufferage
A deviation from the liberal principle of franchise based on property
State financial support for workers' coopratives
In practice it took the form of protection of workers generally
The workers movement sought out Lassalle, he did not create the organization himself
Lassallebelieved that male sufferage would promote civil war, and was hostile to parliamentarianism
Lassallehoped that he could help establish a Germany that was not unlike the France of Napoleon III a parliamentary government with a monarch who would protect worker interests
The early workers movement espoused liberal ideals
Lassallepaved the way Marxismto enter German political thought, even if he appeared to be an opponent of sorts to Marx
Union of German Workers' Leagues
Differed from ADAV:
Retained close ties to bourgeois radicals
Concerns were less political than ADAV
More democratic than ADAV
Fell apart by 1870
August Bebelwas elected president of the Verbund at the fourth congress in 1867 (?)
Bebel and Wilhelm Liebknechtworked to connect the Verbund to the [[file:../20210204223950-first_international.org][First International]]
In 1869 the Verbund voted to dissolve and merge into the Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei
Verbund promoted trade unionswhen ADAV tried to avoid them
Bebeland Liebknechtwere (as the author asserts) the two most important individuals in German social democracy history prior to WWI
August Bebelwas elected to the German Reichstagevery term between 1871 and 1912
Wilhelm Liebknechtwas a firebrand, "a man of extremes", was acquainted with Marxand Engels
ADAV became more autocratic over time, increasing dissatisfaction among members
ADAV cooperated with Prussiaopenly
With the disillusion of the Verbund and a split likely to happen in the ADAV, Bebel, Liebknecht, and others managed to unite the two factions under the SDAP
The founders of the SDAP worked to prevent the rise of a personality cult, a singular autocratic leader as had happened in the ADAV
it did so by having the entire executive elected by local party organizations
During the formation the SDAP resolved itself to not be like the ADAV
Bebel had the following points regarding party formation:
Local organizations and the general organization had to be equally important
The organization had to have monthly dues
Dues should be waived for subscribers of the party paper
The SDAP avoided using the term "republic" anywhere in its name or program for fear of being politically repressed
Critique of the Gotha Programmewas published posthumously by Karl Kautskyin 1891 (at the behest of Engels to fight Lassalleanism within the party, which was at least as popular as Marxism was in the party from the start
In 1870 Napoleon IIIdeclared war on Prussia
The ADAV considered Napoleon the chief enemy of socialism on the continent
The SDAP was ambivalent as a party, but Bebel and Liebknecht opposed the war vocally
The workers movement overall was opposed to the war
A red scare of sorts led to Bebel and Liebknecht sentenced to prison for two years
The founding of Germany led to an economic boom, and subsequently did wonders for the German workers movement
In the early days of the German Empire the German Reichstagwas an impotent political body
Germany implemented universal male sufferage, but it hardly mattered because of how weak the Reichstag was
German unification made it easier for the various workers' parties to unify
Once Germany unified Bismarckconsidered the socialists enemies of the state
After unification the SDAP was significantly better organized than the ADAV
In 1874 in Gotha, the ADAV and the SDAP unified into the SADP (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei Deutschlands), adopting a primarily Lassallean program:
iron law of wages
"one reactionary mass#34;
state funded workers' co-ops
Marxand Engelscriticized the new program in Critique of the Gotha Programme and elsewhere, though saw the unification as ultimately a victory
The SADP operated with a strong central executive committee that controlled local organizations
the organizations rules made it difficult for one person to have too much influence
In 1876 the Prussian government dissolved the SADP
this did not stop the party from growing however
Two assassination attempts on Kaiser Wilhelm Iwere the justification for Bismarck to dissolve the Reichstag and outlaw the socialist parties
In 1878 the Reichstag passed anti-socialist legislation that outlawed socialist parties until 1890
While outlawed, the SADP became the most popular political party in the Reich
The anti-socialist law was moderate compared to 20th century standards, but harsh by the standards of the time
The law repressed socialists in the following ways:
Meetings suspected of being communist / socialist in nature could be broken up and property could be confiscated
Participants were fined
Leaders were jailed for several years
What was considered socialist was often left up to local authorities, and local authorities came down on any organization that even seemed socialist
In spite of all this the SADP was still incredibly popular, and socialists were not barred from being elected to the Reichstag
In these years there were factions that centered around Reichstag politics and being more radical
The radicals won out for the following reasons:
Bebel was a radical
The moderates were not as skilled as the radicals
Many of those who could have led the moderates emigrated or died
Marxism gained a lot of ground in the party and was advanced as the ideology of German social democracy in this time
In the 1880s Karl Kautskyand Eduard Bernsteinemerged as the party's leading theoreticians. Bebel too became a Marxist in this time
Marxism gave the radical factions a clear ideological vision, as opposed to the moderates who lacked a specific vision
The anti-socialist law itself made heroes out of the socialists. The law was seen as extremely repressive and this made the socialists look sympathetic
Many large cities in Germany had local clandestine socialist organizations
This outlaw period inspired a sense of heroism among the German socialists
Some characteristics of the German Reichstag
In 1871 elections were held every 3 years, and after 1893 every 5 years
Election required an absolute majority, otherwise a runoff election was held between the two highest vote getters
The Reichstag had several major political factions:
Socialists
Conservatives
National Liberals
Center
Various left-liberal alignments
Various smaller parties
The SPD's constituency was the industrial working class
The SPD was the only truly national party in Germany. All others were regional
All local organizations were capable of running candidates
The SPD was not interested in creating "winning machines" so much as they were propagandists
The SPD was largely ambivalent about winning elections. It wasn't their primary focus but they tried anyway
The SADP's ability to survive the outlaw period was remarkable in itself
Bismarck found other political opponents besides the socialists as time went on, allowing the socialists to gain more ground electorally
1890 was a turning point: now that the socialists could operate openly they won almost 20% of the vote
The most serious election for the SPD was the election of 1907, called the Hottentot election which resulted in the biggest loss for the SPD since the 1890s
The biggest electoral gain for the SPD was the election of 1912, where the SPD won more than four million votes
Rosa Luxemburgwas critical of this victory, as she felt that the focus on electoral politics distracted from real socialist work and required the SPD to compromise its message
After 1912 the SPD entered into an agreement with the Progressive party to trade support in a runoff election, something they had never done before, and actively opposed
Success in electoral politics seems to have bred contentment with the status quo
The disaster that was 1907 is in part why the party was willing to make a compromise in 1912
"The party sacrificed principle without gaining much advantage"
The compromise would deal a death-blow to the radicalism of the party
The outlaw period had fostered a sense of camaraderie among the SPD members elected to the Reichstag, and thus they always voted together
One of the strengths of this period was the fact that the German SPD was so strongly united
Since the beginning however there had been internal disagreements between moderates and radicals in the party
Prior to the outlaw period German social democrats largely saw the Reichstag as a way of platforming issues and speechmaking, rather than a means of accomplishing anything
Liebknecht believed that the Reichstag was a "fig leaf for despotism"
Eventually however the socialists felt that they could make better use of their seats in the Reichstag by proposing legislation
Bismarckdealt with social democracy in two ways:
Active repression
"Bribing" the lower classes with social safety nets, hoping to win favor with the workers and take that favor away from the socialists
The socialists were caught off guard by the second tactic of Bismarck's, and between 1881 and 1884 weren't sure how to handle it
Would they support legislation that made the lives of workers better, thereby admitting that the state was not the enemy of the workers?
In the end they decided to vote against Bismarck's social insurance on the grounds that they were being repressed anyway
Voting against them made them more popular, as it showed the workers that the S(A)PD was on the side of the workers
This would not happen today
As time went on moderate socialists did not see the state as the enemy, and that the state could be used for reform
Eventually the SPD began proposing their own legislation
The German socialists in the Reichstag were always reformist, as they never introduced legislation that in any way altered the property relations of Germany
Few socialists saw these things as ends in themselves
For the entire period that this book covers, all social democrats felt that by proposing reforms they could at least make achieving their own goals easier
The socialists in the Reichstag were always looking to reform the rules around the Reichstag in particular. Parliamentary immunity was often sought after because the socialists in the Reichstag were frequently imprisoned
Socialists were not equal before the law in Imperial Germany
The goals of the social democrats in parliament included:
Broader rights for women
Legitimacy of children born out of wedlock
Limit police and court powers of search and seizure
Open trials and jury proceedings
Depoliticization of civilian courts
Reducing the role of religion in schools and in courts
Tried to get the law to apply to everyone in Germany equally, as Alsace-Lorraine for example was governed by special status
Tried to lower franchise age
Tried to reform Reichstag seat distribution
Elimination of indirect taxes
Chancellor to be responsible to the will of the people
Progressive income tax
None of these things were ends in themselves but would help the social democrats in their more radical goals
None of their proposed reforms were ever enacted into law
Also tried to introduce labor law, such as an 8 hour work day
None of the proposals made by the SPD posed a serious challenge to German capitalism
The more Marxist members of the SPD were uncertain of how a socialist society could emerge from a capitalist one simply by proposing legislation
As time went on the SPD began to see the state as a weapon that could be used by the socialists instead of their opponents
Paul Singerwas the person who organized the SPD delegation to the Reichstag during the Wilhelm years
Singer was a business owner who gradually became a socialist
He used his business to help fund the SPD's political activities
In an early Reichstag speech, Liebknecht said that the best foreign policy was no foreign policy at all
For a long time the SPD supplied no commentary on foreign policy, although they did betray some biases:
Most socialists were nominally pacifists, though in practice this was not the case
They hated and feared Imperial Russia
Most socialists opposed a standing army and preferred a defense militia
Opposition to colonialism and imperialism
In the late 1880s Bismarck introduced a bill that involved funding of steamboats. The social democrats were split on whether or not they'd support the legislation, and ultimately chose to attach an unreasonable amount of amendments to the bill
During this period the social democrats developed a contradictory critique of colonialism:
To them colonialism was a holdover of feudalism rather than something that was capitalistic
They also saw colonialism as "exporting the social question" i.e. a capitalist effort to cope with overproduction and overpopulation in the metropole
Unlike English colonialism, German colonialism was largely a drain on the German economy
Colonialism was also rejected by socialists on humanistic grounds
German social democracy offered no worthwhile critique of colonialism overall, save for a few theoreticians like Karl Kautsky
The SPD had a hard time deciding if imperialism was progressive as well
Rosa Luxemburgcritiqued the SPD policy on imperialism
A. Fendrich (?) anticipated Vladimir Lenin#39;s critique of imperialism
The socialists felt that they did not need to develop a "world policy," as there would be plenty of time for that once they seized state power
The socialists were known for their anti-militarism, and were often seen as unpatriotic
Karl Liebknechtsaw militarism as a weapon against the proletariat
The German fear of Russia was similar to the fear of Russia in the United States, and this fact weighed heavily on the minds of the social democrats
Partnership and compromise led to a weakening of the SPD position, and had they not compromised perhaps they would have been more militantly opposed to WWI
Prior to the 1860s workers organizations were rare in Germany due to reactionary repression after 1848
Functioned more like medieval guilds
First modern trade unionin Germany was formed in 1862 called the Fortbildungsverein fur Buchdrucker und Schriftsetzer
Focused on ecnomic well-being of members
Because the ADAVespoused the iron law of wages they were not vigorous supporters of trade unions
only pressure from below caused them to become involved with trade unions
In contrast to the ADAV August Bebelrecognized the importance of trade unions and worked for their establishment
Strikes were contentious within the SDAP at first, because strikes were not always a net gain for workers, and in fact sometimes made things worse
During the reactionary repression period trade unions all but vanished, as they were difficult to operate in exile
Trade unions were never subordinate to the SP(A)D, it's just that the party benefitted from the success of the unions
After the antisocialist law was repealed, the German trade unions unified, making it easier to deal with the SPD as an equal
Union membership exploded after the repeal of the antisocialist laws
As time went on, as the unions grew, so did their bureaucracy
Carl Legienwas the head of the general union commission from 1890 to 1920, and was roughly the equivalent of Samuel Gompers but not as powerful
Legien was an active socialist an SPD member as well
Although the party did not believe in the iron law of wages they continued to believe that improved working conditions were only half measures
The party did not heavily invest in trade union activity because they felt that capitalism was going to be overthrown any day now, and that it would be superfluous
In 1893 trade union membership made up 12.3% of the party vote, and by 1907 it was 57%
The author believes that despite this high membership, the party should have been prioritized, and yet it was not
The mass striketactic was one that had been around long before the SPD
Rudolf Hilferdinghad proposed it as a way to get out of the parliamentary gridlock the SPD found themselves in
By 1903 the SPD was actively opposed to the idea of a mass strike, so much so that when the idea was floated at the Second International the SPD simply ignored the matter
The 1905 Russian Revolutionhad shown the value in this tactic, however
The party became conservative regarding strikes because the rising cost of living etc. was making striking more risky
The same socio-economic situation which made union leaders conservative had the opposite effect on the rank and file. The rising cost of living, the intense and widely shared experience of strike and lockout, and the unprecedented aggressiveness of employers generated in the workers a new militancy and a receptiveness to radical political ideas. —- Carl Schorske, German Social Democracy, 1905-1917, as quoted in this book
Between 1905 and 1906 the use of the mass strike was fiercely debated
Trade unions opened the debate with opposition to the tactic
At a party congress in 1906 August Bebelgave one of the longest speeches in party history saying that it was a worthwhile tactic. The resolution passed
He believed that trade unions should be subordinate to the party
In 1906 the general union commission and the central committee of the SPD signed a secret deal saying that the party would fund strikes but would actively work to prevent strikes
The mass strike was thus only to be used as a defensive tactic
The author implies that the increasing bureaucracy in the trade unions caused a rise in such conservative attitudes
The growth of the bureaucracycaused a turning down of radical politics among workers (as is common
Legien believed that unions were the agents of the transition to socialismand permanent features of socialist society as well
German socialists were pariahs in their own country for a number of reasons, including being perceived as unpatriotic and anti-religious
Because socialists were excluded from institutions and things such as social clubs, socialists often made their own counterpart organizations
Party rarely kept records about itself for fear of being cracked down upon by police
Most important role in the SPD prior to 1905 were the Vertrauenspersonen, elected channels of communication between the locals
The most atomic form of the party was the local
Strong local personalities led to the reform of 1905
The two things that caused the 1905 reforms were the inadequate reforms of 1900, the fact that the association laws in Prussia were eased, and that the left wing of the party was concerned about the moderate part of the party growing
These radicals felt the only solution was strong centralization
Vertrauenspersonen system was done away with
Between local level orgs were a district and state level organization, which in turn reported to the national
Bureaucracy was added at every level, causing conservative swings in the party
Like so many other bureaucracies in so many other places, that of the SPD was better designed to maintain the status quo than it was to respond swiftly to the frequently changing moods of the people it supposedly served.
The centralization countered the reformist bend of the party but not the conservative one
Emotionally and intellectually, many of the radicals were included to place a great deal of faith in the radical potential of the SPD's mass following, so much so that they failed to discover until it was too late that the bureaucracy very effective buffered party policy and the leadership from the pressure of the more radical lower echelons of the movement.
So powerful was the attraction of organization for the radicals that on at least two occasions when they analyzed the dilemma of the party as a crisis of leadership, their only solution was to expand the executive. In August 1905, during the peak of the debate over the mass strike, Karl Kautsky observed to his friend Victor Adler , the leader of Austrian socialism, that the executive was "a collegium of old men who have become so absorbed in bureaucracy and parliamentarianism that they curse every increase of their work load." Kautsky's solution was to add new members to the executive, including two or three trade unionists. Given the profoundly reformist inclinations of most leading trade unionists, these additions could only have made the executive more cautious.
The growing bureaucratization brought with it standardization and office work, e.g. purchasing of typewriters
Party congresses were the top of the organizational structure of the SPD, which dealt with either exceptional issues or challenges to party leadership
Police attended party congresses and could interrupt speakers and even shut down sessions
Workers were over-represented in the SDP, since most of its membership was industrial urban workers
The primary function of the SDP press was education and propaganda
Wilhelm Liebneckt: "Knowledge is power."
Clara Zetkinwas most notable in this period, as her background was in journalism, she was a major figure in SPD publishing
SPD publishing included newspapers, theoretical journals, special interest workers newspapers, and so on
SPD newspapers only accounted for at most 2% of Germany's total newspapers
Everyday language often had radical underpinnings in imperial Germany. Arbeiter often in effect meant "socialist" for example
By the 1900s the socialists had all kinds of ancillary worker's associations, such as cycling clubs, singing clubs, etc.
A "free thinkers" club to combat theism
These associations were often not part of a union or party and were not financially supported in that manner
Workers libraries were set up but they were not very popular until after 1914
Socialism was largely a male activity in Germany, and this had four results:
Women often formed their own associations
Women who managed to join male-dominated socialist groups tended to be more radical than their male counterparts
Women were frequently oppressed within the party, and weren't allowed to participate politically until 1908
After 1908 women participation exploded. The end of separate organizations reduced both their radicalism and influence
Three major factors effected the development of the SPD:
Nature of economic activity of an area's population
Political practices of a given region
Overwhelming dominance of Prussia
A recurring debate throughout the party was whether or not to vote for budgets. The socialists always voted no
The SPD operated all throughout Germany, not just inside of Prussia, and it was these regional differences that caused certain parties to behave differently
When Prussia acquired the rest of Germany, Prussia simply became the powerhouse of the larger German state
State workers had to vote using open ballots and could not legally strike or join socialist parties. This caused the SPD to focus on public workers in particular
A large debate that went through the entire history of the SPD in this time was whether or not the SPD should participate in the Landtag, the local Prussian representative assembly
Getting elected to the Landtag was difficult
Socialists wanted to get elected to try and change the insane Prussian voting laws
Bavaria was very agricultural, less draconian than Prussia, and open to reform
A prominent socialist in the SPD branch in Bavaria managed to make the peasant question a national issue
Bavarian socialists were hostile to the centralization efforts of the party
The official ideology of the SPD was Marxismbut that doesn't mean even most of the party or most of the rank-and-file were necessarily guided by Marxism
For the most part the party was eclectic and opportunistic in its approach to practical activities, with limits imposed only by a very vague, rarely articulated set of assumptions.These assumptions—-including hostility to the state, concern for the welfare of industrial workers, rejection of capitalism, and a commitment to political democracy (i.e. universal sufferage with a responsible Representative government)—-were not sufficiently precise or consistent to justify the label theory.
Theory was not always the most important part of the SPD, and it was not consistent, but it was majorly funded by the party
Ferdinand Lassalledrove the theory of the social democratic movement initially, promoting:
state-supported workers coops
Lassalle believed that the state could eventually be used to move away from capitalism and into socialism
Lassalle was more of a figurehead than a theoretician
Babel and Liebknecht believed that the party's theory would develop with party actions, and as such only developed theory when they believed it would help them politically
Eugen Dühring in the early days of the worker's movement, proposed a comprehensive system for understanding the universe, and human society for all history, rejecting all major thinkers before him
Duhring was majorly influential, having been an enemy of the enemy of the social democrats and a reputable intellectual
Eduard Bernsteinwas a disciple of Duhring's
Marxand Engelscountered Duhring with the text now known as /Anti-Dühring
Anti-Dühringconverted Karl Kautskyand Eduard Bernsteinto Marxism
Engels gave Kautsky a copy of Critique of the Gotha Programme something which had circulated privately but had never been published as of the late 1880s. Kautsky used this to develop the strong theoretical base of the party
Upon the publication of Gotha, the Reichstag Faktion harshly attacked Kautsky
Wilhelm Liebknechthad never deeply studied Marx's ideas, but often used the fact that he personally knew Marx and Engels as a cudgel. He had always instead been focused on politics
Karl Kautskywas perhaps the largest popularizer of Marxism after Engels
Kautsky's earlier works did not add anything to Marxism, but were summarizations and simplifications of Marx's works
Kautskyand Bebelhad a mutually cooperative working relationship, even if they occassionally disagreed
Eduard Bernstein#39;s revisionismwas combatted harshly by Kautsky, who ended up winning out against Bernstein twice in two major party votes on whether or not the party should become reformist
Kautsky's influence in the party decreased rapidly with the death of Bebel, and he finally left the SPD in 1913 after opposing entering the first world war
Kautsky believed the SPD was "revolutionary" and not "revolution-making", that the goal of socialist activity should be to heighen contradictions in capitalist society rather than armed insurrection
Kautsky believed in the "strategy of attrition", of wearing down the enemy (capitalist society) progressively
Initially, Bernstein was not very theoretical. He devoted much of his early time in the SPD to organizing work.
Bernstein became an editor of an important party newspaper, and received personal correspondence with Engels. His editorial line sided with Bebel and Liebkneckt.
Bernstein worked out of Switzerland during the outlaw period, and then once the Reich had pressured Switzerland to expel the German socialists, he moved to London until 1901.
While in London Bernstein came under the influence of English thinkers, and once Engels died, he felt free to publish his own opinions without fear of offending an old friend. His first work is called Evolutionary Socialism.
The author makes the distinction between /reformism and /revisionism/, where the former believes in political action to reform either the party or the state. The latter, according to Bernstein, is the active revising of Marxist orthodoxy under the auspices that it's insufficient.
Bernstein ended up rejecting the core of Marxism, in favor of a gradualist approach to achieving socialism.
Many of Bernstein's initial claims were common sense, and not well-researched. Bernstein was an autodidact, not a trained intellectual. Although is claims proved to be challenging for contemporary Marxists, his claims were also shallow and lacked rigor. He was very harshly criticized, even internationally.
Bernstein's revisionism took root and could not be rooted out by the party, as the party refused to take a strong stance for or against it.
Luxemburg was one of the very few prominent women in German social democracy, and was an exceptionally talented thinker. Despite this, she was personally very harsh and this tended to isolate her from others. It's perhaps for this reason, the author speculates, that she has no lasting institutional staying power in German social democracy.
Luxemburg received a doctorate in law in Poland, and became involved in the international socialist movement by means of her ability to speak multiple languages. She was exiled from Poland eventually, and found her way to Germany, having been a close correspondant to Karl Kautsky.
Luxemburg always took the position of radicals, and since the SPD was trying to balance good standing with many political alliances, this meant the party itself would always play a centrist position, obviously antithetical to the radicalism of Luxemburg.
Luxemburg wrote Reform or Revolution in response to Bernstein, arguing that his attitude was petty-bourgeois rather than radical. His reforms had nothing to do with abolishing wage labor.
Luxemburg alienated herself from trade unionists due to something she wrote in Social Reform or Revolution where she says that unions [[file:../20210228142031-the_role_of_trade_unions_in_the_transition_to_socialism.org][can only hope to achieve better working conditions]] in the short term and only locally, and themselves cannot overcome capitalism.
In the debate on the mass strike Luxemburg's contribution to the debate can be found in Mass Strike, Party, and Trade Unions.
Much of Luxemburg's work within the SPD during the middle of the first decade of the 1900s was to push the party in a more radical and active direction.
Luxemburg's most famous work is The Accumulation of Capital, which deals with capitalist reproduction, which Marx also deals with in Capital Vol. 2and Vol. 3. She weighs in on imperialism(she felt that imperialism was not special in terms of the characteristics of capitalism overall) and felt that the role of socialists in an imperialist country were more pressing than those in non-imperialist ones.
Prior to the outbreak of the First World War internationalismseemed like a unique characteristic of the working class movement, with German social democrats at the forefront of this internationalism.
The SPD was the biggest financier of the Second International.
The SPD almost always had to worry about the reaction from the German state, unlike socialist parties in other European nations.
The question of imperialismwas of utmost importance to the Second International, and the SPD ultimately played a moderating role in this discussion.
According to the author, the SPD contributed to the Second International in the following ways:
Its presence guaranteed that it was taken seriously by the bourgeois world.
The German presence stabilized the otherwise volatile organization.
The strict German attitude of not cooperating with non-socialist forces delayed the growth of reformist positions elsewhere, while not necessarily advocating a more radical direction.
The lack of political unity in the German worker's movement contributed to the rise of Nazism
Historians have generally focused on internal weaknesses or failings of the SPD to explain its inability to achieve its espoused ends and to hold the working class together. Some have argued that an opportunistic, reformist leadership sold out the rank and file, betraying socialist principles by not pressing for radical reform in the years before 1914 to 1918. Others have argued that ireresponsible elements of the party's left wing needlessly imperiled working-class unity and the prospects for meaningful reform by talking revolution and urging putschist activities that could only result in disaster. Leninist critics have found fault with the party's rather lose organizational structure and its middle-of-the-road theory. More moderate analysts have emphasized the extent to which the radical ideology of the prewar years failed to come to grips with the real gains made by workers during that period.
These arguments all carry some weight. There can be little doubt that, however justified its fears of repression may have been, the reluctance of the SPD leadership to use more aggressive means to pressure for social and political reform severely restricted the ability of the movement to influence developments in Imperial Germany. Similarly, the cumbersome bureaucratic structure that grew up after 1905-1906 clearly isolated the leadership from the sometimes volatile moods of the rank and file. At the same time, if the crisis of interwar Germany was in part the result of the lack of unity in the working class, the problem would only have been exacerbated had the party leadership pursued a more aggressive course earlier; the forces favoring moderation ⸻ and they were formidable ⸺ would have been unlikely to tolerate such a posture.
Given the ambiguous nature of poltics in the Second Reich and the important regional distinctions within the party, as well as the explicit and implicit differences between the party and the trade unions, unity probably could only have been maintained as it was; that is, by studiously avoiding confrontation with the enemy, trying to preseve internal solidarity, and just waiting for the revolution. While there may have been room for tactical variations on specific issues, the general approach of the party could not have been much different.
Ultimately the fact that the party was constantly trying to balance trade union interest and avoid being repressed caused them to take a more moderate approach, and ultimately betray their revolutionary ambitions.
The SPD itself was torn on the question of reform vs. revolution and as such had an incoherent attitude towards addressing this question.
It's noteworthy that both the Second Reichand the SPDwere known for their sprawling bureaucracy, leading Max Weberto conclude that it was a new type of organization.
The success of the SPD led to an undermining of its radical activity
The SPD probably had one of the most effective propaganda wings of any organization in Germany at the time.
The fact that the SPD had a spurious relationship to formal ideology also caused them to have inconsistent political action sometimes.
Lenin#39;s conception of the vanguard partywas a response to the SPD's strategy of a "party in waiting."
And this. This is the note that will go forth and timestamp appropriately in the [[Logs]] directory.
Coronavirus claim:
Some nice advice from [[Maya]] on physical [[notebooks]]: https://occult.institute/@maya/107597154763772355
Listening: [[Socialist States & the Environment w/ Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro]]
[[Benefits need to increase]]. Some people are really struggling right now.
[[Attempting to ban protest is the mark of a repressive state]]. That’s what the UK is doing right now.
[[FarmBot]]. Looks fun but kind of pricey.
Interesting to skim through [[Mastodon Annual Report 2021]]. Seems pretty positive in general. The move to a non-profit entity sounds healthy, the long-term sustainability looks good.
[[Epicyon]] continues to look good. I like all the [[mutual aid]] related stuff that Bob puts into it.
Reading: [[Against Digital Colonialism]]
My [[Node Club Tarot]] reading for the week:
flancian I really miss having flancia. The place seems very lethargic without flancia
flancian I really miss having flancia. The place seems very lethargic without flancia
flancian I really miss having flancia. The place seems very lethargic without flancia
flancian I really miss having flancia. The place seems very lethargic without flancia
A friend is trying some [[Hügelkultur]] beds
Looks like a ton of [[Planet Mu]] back catalog is on [[Resonate]]. That’s rad!
My shoulder pain is getting really bad. Might be time to ditch my old keyboard and get one of these fancy ergo split keyboards. ErgoDox EZ is crazy expensive but looks repairable/durable and if it lasts nearly 20 years like my current one, I can justify it…
[[Invasion of Ukraine]].
[[Foundations of Geopolitics]] "reads like a to-do list for Putin’s behaviour on the world stage"
I am getting through my [[Resonate]] credits pretty quick as I stream it through the work day. But one very sweet thing - I can set myself a monthly limit, and if I run out of credits I can just play the things that I’ve streamed enough to own (as at this point, you don’t pay any more to stream them). The stream2own model is really cool.
Cobbled together a dark theme for my digital garden. It needs some more love but at least it’ll stop burning my eyeballs when I look at it late on my phone.
Yes that’s right, I read my own digital garden. What of it! I find occasionally browsing through the recent changes is a decent low-key [[spaced repetition]].
is it weird to analyze margaritaville as an example of an [[intentional community]]?
[[retirement communities]] as intentional communities: weirdly isolated by money and age, but otherwise I’d bet there’s more interesting stuff to dig into. which ones work? which ones haven’t? is this separable from the horrors of the [[elder abuse]] in the [[assisted living]] industry?
brb reading about the duwamish coop again :( (hang on should they even have that domain?)
I feel like kicking this essay in the shins and I haven’t figured out totally why or whether it’s worth putting my finger on.
Chatted with Alan about [[using solar panels for the home]].
Chatted with Chris the other day about [[AC and DC]]
We saw [[marsh harrier]]s and [[red kite]]s and [[cormorant]]s.
Read: [[Apple Promised Us a Repair Program, Where the Hell Is It?]]
Reading: [[On the Sustainability of Free Software]]
Read: [[Incredibly, current climate pledges could keep heating below 2C – but our work isn’t over]]
Attended the [[social.coop Spring 2022 Strategy Session]] yesterday. Was nice to see peeps and chat about the coop.
Donated to [[Cumbria Action for Sustainability]] Big Cumbrian Climate Challenge campaign via The Big Give.
Enjoyed the session on [[Rewilding]] at the [[Transition Together Summit]]
Finished reading [[Red Plenty]]. Half-fact half-fiction account of Khruschev-era Soviet attempts at economic central planning and its collapse. Epic book. Francis Spufford is a virtuoso writer. No clue how objective it is. But it’s a very good read.
Went along to commons.hour last night - topic [[Public-civic collaboration, coop incubators and stewarding digital infrastructure as a commons]]
[[Isabelle Stengers]] / [[Anna Tsing]]
[[Otto Neurath]] accounting sounds similar to what is in [[P2P Accounting for Planetary Survival]].
Yesterday we went on a beautiful walk at sunset with [[Chris]], it was great!
At the lookout point we met [[Enrique]] and we became friends.
[[Free association of producers]] is a goal of socialism/communism.
[[Net zero policies would reduce the cost of living]]. That’s an incredibly important line of enquiry to pursue. Talk of [[degrowth]] isn’t appealing if you’re already on the breadline.
‘The cost of living’ is a wretched phrase.
Reading: [[Marx’s Vision of Sustainable Human Development]]
[[Energy storage]] and [[grid balancing]].
The [[Iceberg Model]]
The [[water cycle]] is a complex system.
[[systems mapping]]
What Makes a Partnership Transformational? | World Resources Institute
Address systemic problems.
Change the status quo.
Sustain impacts.
Kind of revolution in UN-friendly words.
More charity shop wins:
[[The UK should have a national programme of home insulation]]
I didn’t meditate more formally until way too late today, around 21, and that feels like a mistake in retrospect. But that’s OK, tomorrow I’ll go back to meditating in the morning.
Listened: [[The Green Transition – The Problem with Green Capitalism Part 1]]
[[Stacks]] seem like the formulation of ICT into capitalist vehicles - hence relevance to my study.
The last two chapters of [[Radical Technologies]] are gold.
Learning a bit about [[guild socialism]] through reading [[Platform Socialism]]. It sounds good. Good healthy dollops of municipalism and subsidiarity.
Reading: [[Less is More]]
Listening: [[Trip 30: Gifts]]
Listening: [[Benjamin Bratton on Synthetic Catallaxies, Platforms of Platforms & Red Futurism]]
Listening (a while ago): [[42. TECH FOR GOOD]]
Reading: [[Digitalization and the Anthropocene]]
I’ve been publishing less in my digital garden since (a) working on my research project; (b) getting an e-ink tablet (because I write most of my notes as handwritten notes in there). I’d like to rectify this when I get a chance, there will be some useful way I can get those publishing online to my garden I’m sure.
Amanecí y llegamos a la tarde con alegría con [[AG]], y después comimos y caminamos con [[Diego]] y [[Dominic]].
Go back to [[daily notes]], also synced at this week’s recap in the [[Personal Board (open that in Obsidian)]].
gh:gitpodify/workspace-images, especially around pre-commit configsgit init + bashbox init for gh:gitpodify/dazzle-build-script based on the build scripts on gh:gitpod-io/workspace-imagesRepaired: [[Repairing a Cat Mate C500 automatic pet feeder]]
[[Global boiling]]
Listened: [[Trip 35: The Internet]]
[[org-timeblock]] and calfw-blocks look worth a look. I’m currently using [[org-timeline]], one of these might be better (although it works well enough for me).
Read: [[The Double Objective of Democratic Ecosocialism]]. By Jason Hickel. Great. First I’ve seen him explicitly mention [[degrowth]] and [[ecosocialism]] together (quite likely he has before, given his outlook, just first time I’ve noticed it). The prefix of ‘Democratic’ is interesting though. Deliberate positioning with [[democratic socialism]] I presume, as opposed to say [[degrowth communism]].
I’d like to do this: org mode - Org-publish: Ignore errors when publishing and report them later
Part 3 revealed Cal’s frustrations with Welsh Judo bureaucracy.
Five-hour drives. Useless governing bodies. Insurance companies calling the shots.
The modern grading process?
"Farcical."
And katas?
Just Kano’s way of keeping bored students busy while others did the real work.
Now in our final round, Cal shows us the magic that happens when students learn through play.
This post is part 4 of 4.
PART 1
Cultural Difficulties in Introducing the Ecological Approach
Why bother trying to spread the Ecological Approach?
Tensegrity & Unity of Action
PART 2
How did people find Cal Jones?
Lesson Learned in Applying the Constraints-Led Approach
The Mysticism of Names
PART 3
Regulatory Difficulties for Rogue Gyms
Improving the Belt System
Where do Katas come from?
PART 4
[[Emergent Skills]]
[[Games for Turn Throws]]
[[The Role of Memory]]
With that student, what surprises you most? What do they come up with?
Everything.
The thing that always gets me is when they start doing stuff with names. Things that exist as techniques, completely organically. That’s always wild to me.
These things are just emergent movements.
You know it intuitively. Because for somebody to do it, they must have once made it up. But the fact that it will happen. Over and over again, if we forgot everything. All the moves of grappling.
If everybody had their minds wiped, and they went back and started play-fighting, they’d come up with the same shit.
There’s only so many ways you can do it.
I love that. You have a complete novice that you’ve brought on, and they do a drop fireman’s carry. And you go, "Where did you see that?"
"See what? What did we do?"
"Well, you just did a drop Kata-guruma."
"Oh, I just grabbed his leg and it felt natural."
"You see that old guy there, that’s sort of limping around? He’s been trying to do that for thirty years. He can’t do it. You’ve just come along and grabbed a leg and accidentally done it."
These moments, I think, are joyous.
On a more nebulous level, you end up with far more creative players. They’re not limited by spider diagrams in their head. Where they’re trying to remember what the correct sequence of events is.
They’re more in-tune to what’s happening.
You know, somebody puts a hand down. They grab at that hand, and they’re trying to sweep or armbar. They’re testing it. They’re looking for haptic feedback.
They’re just well-tuned to the performance environment.
It’s so much more fun to watch.
I might be biased, but I’d rather watch my guys, then. The people down the road that I know.
Oh, I see. We’re going to be doing that now, are we?
What do you use for turn throws? What situation do you put people in that they do turn throws?
O-Goshis, Koshi Gurumas, that sort of thing?
Little games.
One of the ones I do is just, ‘can you get your back to touch their chest’.
At any point, if I can get my back to touch your chest, I get a point. That’s a really useful way of getting them into position. They start to turn away from their opponent and chip those distances down.
And then you just progress it.
Can I get your chest to touch my back? Can I get your feet off the floor? Once I’ve got your feet off the floor, can I get you to land on the ground?
So it becomes a series of tasks that become more and more representative as you progress in it.
The fun thing is, I know the black belts are going to be way better at getting their back to touch the opponent than the white belts. If it is the case that the better players are consistently better at the tasks, it’s probably helping.
There’s probably something useful, there.
If I did it as a practice task and everyone was shit at it- the black belts were useless too, then I might have to think: is this going to be transferring? Because it’s backwards compatible, a bit.
I do that quite a lot for all the hip techniques.
Well, Seoi Nage isn’t classified as a hip technique, but it should be in my opinion. There you go. Anything where you’re standing in front of them, turning, bending, and picking them up to rotate the move.
Really useful game for that.
If it’s something more like a Tai Otoshi, where your foot is on the floor, I’ll just have ‘can you use the back of your leg to block the front of their leg’. I don’t specify if it’s the near leg or the far leg, because if you block in the near leg then it builds into Uchi Mata stuff, or a thing the Americans call ‘The Chop’.
It’s not a scoring thing, but it’s a really useful way of engaging into Ne-waza.
That’s worked brilliantly.
I’ve had some massive success. Some really good Tai Otoshi players, purely from ‘can you use the back of your leg to block the front of their leg’. It’s such an intuitive thing.
That builds into Harai Goshis, Uchi Matas, O-Gurumas, and Ashi Gurumas. You’re doing the exact same thing. You’re just not putting your foot on the floor. If my leg is up and across your thigh, it’s an O-Guruma. If my leg is up and across your knee-line, it would be an Ashi Guruma.
You’re basically taking a cluster of every forward-facing throw in Judo, and putting it as one of, probably three different entries. Yeah…there’s a few more. But it’s ‘can you turn and get your back in’, ‘can you turn and block with your leg’, and ‘can you turn and get your leg on the inside’.
An overwhelming majority of named throws come from that.
What do you think someone was trying to do when they came up with turn throws? I’m not sure if it’s just particularly unintuitive for me or something like that. But it seems like such a weird thing to be forced to do one day. Whoever first started doing these, what situation do you think they were in?
It would probably be, you’re moving away from someone, right?
If someone was shutting you down, and you’ve gone, "Ah!" and turned, grabbed, and managed to flip them over, maybe that was the starting point. And they’ve built from that.
But you’re right. It’s fairly rare that you’d decide, ‘well, I know, I’m going to turn away from you’. All of my weapons are now going to face…that way. You wouldn’t.
But again, it’s common across all cultures. There’s a whole lot of people that have stumbled onto it.
I definitely see Senegalese and Mongolian wrestlers doing this stuff. I guess when someone’s pushing against you hard enough?
Yeah, I guess that’s that, isn’t it? If we’re here, and we’re under tension with each other, and I’m moving backwards. I want to steal that. Turning is one of the only ways. I could block your knees, but we do that as well.
You’ve ended up bound up with each other. Locked into position, and that person is stronger. I can’t feel them that way, so I’m going to have to try and move this way.
And turning is a good way of doing that.
What is something you wish someone had asked you that they haven’t yet?
I can tell you what I don’t enjoy them asking. Anything to do with memory [in the ecological approach]. That’s the bane of my life at the minute. You could just say, ‘I don’t have a good answer’, but it kind of kills it. So you offer a breadcrumb bit that is a conceptualization. And it just feels so hollow, when you have an answer you’re not happy with.
It’s so difficult to understand it for me at the minute.
Like, the processes behind it, because it’s definitely not a retrieval thing. We’re definitely not going through the filofax and picking out the relevant file and pressing play on it. It’s just a truism to say that we have things stored in our head.
There’s neurons, there’s architecture in there that’s changing based on me interacting with my environment. But it’s not this recall, it’s not this processing thing that’s going on. I am just directly attuning to the stuff around me, right?
It seems that people can completely totally accept it so frequently. But the second you start talking about ‘when John shouts, "4492 hut hut hut", he wants me to run a slant route’. So that’s me remembering the play. That’s me processing that information and doing something on the back of it. I don’t think that’s what’s happening.
Sounds really hollow, when you can’t give a really good, precise answer to what is actually happening.
So yeah, that’s the one I dislike the most, because I don’t have a great answer to that.
When a door has a handle that’s not a knob- the kind that you pull. A door that triggers the pull response, but it won’t open unless you push it. Something like that?
Yeah, I hate those doors so much.
In rugby, you’ll have calls for lineouts. The ball will be thrown in. There’s two sets of teams, and they jump to take the ball. The person throwing the ball in will give a call to indicate to their team if they’re throwing to the front, middle, or back.
The claim is that the call is a pre-planned move.
There’s a shared mental model. We ‘press play’, and run through this action.
But if I call the thing that means I’m throwing it to the back, and just before I release the ball, I fall over? Well, they don’t still jump. They’re not ‘pressing play’ on that thing.
They’re attuning to the information.
They’re still looking for the ball.
If the ball went really short and it was going nowhere near the back, they wouldn’t bother jumping. The people that are in front of the ball would catch it. They wouldn’t go, "No, no, no, this is going to the back."
They’re looking at the ball and picking up on information.
Making decisions based on that.
The call is directing their attention. It’s supplying an intention and where to place their attention. Rather than ‘pressing play’ on the motor program that corresponds to the call that’s played.
If I said, "I’m going to punch you in the face", you would probably defend yourself by raising your guard.
But if I just tried to smack you as hard as I could in the stomach, you’d bring your guard down. You wouldn’t just stand here and go, "Oh, he said he’s going to hit me in the face."
This is just directing you, as a ‘probably start here’.
But it’s still this direct perception thing that’s going on.
I think that kind of thing is what’s happening with memory.
So the memory is some sort of pointer.
It kind of acts as a heuristic, honestly. It just acts as guidelines. It’s ‘this is the path that has been previously trod’. But again, I hate memory.
That’s why I drink.
Get rid of yours.
It works alright.
Today is [[14 October 2023]] and I am glad you are here with me.
It has been ages since I’ve in Flancia, sometimes it feels, even as time is varying.
Here is what I call a poem: [[trees]].
This weekend I intend to advance what I call [[open letters]]: documents addressed to groups, openly published even as they are being written.
As of 21:45 CET I did some ‘day job’ stuff (having chosen it) and started a proposal (open letter, as per the above) that I had on my todo list.
Now switching to [[paramita]], planning to continue on related topics but in the [[commons]].
Today we bought the tickets to and from [[Sri Lanka]], happy about it!
Starting having a go at [[an Iterative Enquiry diagram for digital ecosocialism]]. Definite work in progress.
Listened: [[Anthony Hodgson, "Ready for Anything: Designing Resilience for a Transforming World"]]
Fun, busy [[Repair Cafe]] tonight.
Listened: [[WCV S2: We’ve run with it like a dog with a burst ball]]
Yesterday I woke up with back pain in a new place, mid-back; it got a bit worse in the evening after attending the beautiful event of [[AG]] presenting. It didn’t get in the way of enjoyment but I need to keep an eye on it/take care and try to rest and recover.
…Having said that, I cleaned the bathroom and [[Lady Burup]]‘s toilet and my back got a bit worse :) But I feel it still gave me energy.
Then I worked a bit more, after oncall handoff, and I got several things "out of the way" in a relatively short time. It felt great.
Read: [[Doughnut Economics]]
Reflecting back and seeing them published on my website, I realise my work notes each day are a little mundane.
Watched: [[Isle of Dogs]]
Listened: [[The Radical Imagination in Reactionary Times]]
[[Well-connected]].
an [[agora]], early [[2024]]
Listened: [[Why It’s Eco-Socialism or Collapse]]
Interesting to see that ‘Challenging the size and power of the biggest tech companies was voted a top priority by [[Foxglove]] supporters in our new year survey.’
[[AI]]
Listened: [[The Web of Death (ft. Tamara Kneese)]]
Customising some key bindings would make one-handed phone tending my garden in Emacs in termux easier.
Read: [[AI deepfakes come of age as billions prepare to vote in a bumper year of elections]]
Nice to see a mention of the [[Austrian Repair Bonus voucher scheme in National Geographic Kids]].
Read: [[A political ecology of the repair manual]]
[[iFixit and Lenovo]].
[[Listened]]: [[Hotel Bar Sessions: Breaking Things at Work (with Gavin Mueller)]]
Read: [[Reframing and simplifying the idea of how to keep a Zettelkasten]]
Contemplating whether I should send webmentions from my digital garden.
Listened: [[How to talk about avoiding waste, with Keep Britain Tidy]]
Listened: [[Black Box: the hunt for ClothOff – the deepfake porn app]]
[[Updating to Emacs 28 on Linux Mint]].
I updated packages on Mint like a good boy, and now I’m getting complaints from composer when building a project.
We [[watched]] [[Soul]] again.
I [[listened]] to [[What Social Media Meant for the Mass Protest Decade w/ Vincent Bevins]]
Also listened to [[Why Tech Makes Us More Insecure w/ Astra Taylor]]
We have [[national insurance]] in the UK.
Never really thought much about insurance before.
Returning a little to [[IndieWeb]] for following activity streams. I had been using the Fediverse for a while, but I find it a bit too fast paced, a bit too attention grabbing. For me. IndieWeb is kind of slow social media and that suits me fine.
hyperorg could be useful for me.
I’m getting more into the groove with [[fish]] on desktop the more that I use it.
I would just like to take a moment to lament the fact that I have received an email inviting me to become a Certified Generative AI Specialist.
Idle thought: maybe the world would be a better place if the de facto ‘learn to code’ tutorial was not a todo list (individual productivity) but a simple group poll (collective decision-making).
Listened to [[New Economics Podcast: Should we be going for growth?]]
[[Listened]] to [[Ghosts in the Machines: Artificial Intelligence, Consciousness, & Capitalism]]
[[Habitat loss]].
[[Film theory]] looks at films and the effect they have on society.
alpha.social.coop using [[coop cloud]] but it’s not up yet.[[Listened]]: [[Digital colonialism: Geopolitics of data and development]]
[[World-Ecology]].
Here’s a quick summary of what’s cooking behind the scenes today, June 04, 2024:
That’s all for now, see you again soon for another daily note. If I miss something today, I may edit this page or just add it for next daily note instead. Take care.
Why the fuck is [[The Guardian]] advertising some private healthcare subscription to me on their podcasts.
[[Commonism]].
Listened: [[Election Extra: Nigel Farage is back]]
I know it’s a bit self-centered to add the edit box to anagora.org when only I can use it for now, but I wanted to experiment with the editing experience before investing a lot in developing it for others :) I hope it doesn’t get in the way of the experience of others.Bella muy bella Burup, bella muy bella Burup!
Tara Burup Tara-burup!
Bella muy bella [[Burup]]:
Salve!
Bella muy bella Burup, bella muy bella Burup.
Mi true Burup, true Burup.
Bella muy bella [[Burup]]:
Sea!
/Library/Journal/New%20Page/Daily%20Note (template) in your instance.Listening to [[Doughnut Economics]] now.
[[Data commons]] are [[digital ecosocialism]].
On Tuesday I went to a workshop on learning the basics of electrical repairs.
[[Doughnut Economics]] has a good overview of what a [[system]] is and why [[systems thinking]] of useful.
[[Bookmarked]]:
[[There is no such thing as society]]
[[Tweaking Doom Emacs to use SPC SPC]].
We shouldn’t focus so heavily on recycling.
We should put more focus higher up the waste hierarchy.
Also excited to learn that [[Kai Heron]] and [[Keir Milburn]] and [[Bertie Russell]] have co-authored a book: [[Radical Abundance]]: How to Win a Green Democratic Future.
{ sync: true, ignored: true }, it’s a lot faster at zhe cost of errors being emitted [[Listened]]:
[[Bookmarked]]:
[[Bookmarked]]:
[[Read]]:
I’m going to experiment with refactoring some of my overstuffed concept notes.
[[Bookmarked]]:
[[Listened]]:
Could be a useful exercise to apply the [[Three Horizons]] model to [[reclaiming the stacks]].
[[Watched]]:

We don’t have much time before your attention drifts away so I will try to be short, so even if I seem to take some [[detours]], please rest assured that I believe them to be fruitful enough to warrant the diversion.
We will do the [[revolution]] every year, I say, starting the year you’re reading this if this is the first time you read about this, or sometime in your past once our plans have given fruit and we find ourselves in an incrementally better future.
Hear me out: we should start a #Good Revolution every November by default, with actions proposed rational, loving, kind, and in the open taking effect on December 31st; and if you have a better plan, tell me, and we’ll do [[your revolution]] together.
I’ve given up on keeping my journal entries structured and I think I feel freer for it so I will continue to experiment with it.
I keep thinking of that old story I wanted to write, [[search for the mirrormaker]]
You have followed a link to a page that has not yet been created.
On a regular website, this indicates a problem.
On a wiki, it’s not a problem; it just means that a wiki author made a link to a page that will exist in the future, but it is not yet that future time. :-)
You can just go back to the previous page in your browser; or, go to the [[Home]] page of this website.
If you’d like, you can contact Jerry and let him know you’d like to see the page created. Let him know which link you followed.
Thank you for browsing the Rel8 wiki website!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javier_Milei <button class="pull-url autopull" value="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javier_Milei">pull</button>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salmon_%28protocol%29 <button class="pull-url autopull" value="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salmon_%28protocol%29">pull</button>
https://github.com/facebook/create-react-app
Set up a modern web app by running one command. Contribute to facebook/create-react-app development by creating an account on GitHub.
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2023-December/033317.html
Лидер арктической станции поменял на ней часовой пояс и просит tzdb обновить информацию за несколько часов до смены пояса. Выясняется, что там десять лет неправильная информация была до этого. Также он говорит, почему они не перешли на московское время: новости во время обеда не будут стримить.
test
The first computer we had in our house.
My Mum got it on hire purchase and was paying it off for a long time.
I remember typing out programs with my Mum from some big book of BASIC that came with it. I remember doing the program where you make the background change colour a lot, and where you get the same piece of text to print out indefinitely.
It had a tape deck and made awesome sounds when loading off the tape.
The games I remember playing the most are Galactic Plague, Harrier Attack, Sultan’s Maze, and possibly Bard’s Tale (but that one might have been on the Amiga). Rampage? Also Gauntlet! Playing that with my brother, unless again it was for the Amiga. But I’ve a feeling it was the Amstrad.


That’d be this 2014 post on the topology of manifolds and how they relate to neural networks. The visualizations are great, and it basically blew my mind. I didn’t know of the manifold hypothesis until now.
The manifold hypothesis is that natural data forms lower-dimensional manifolds in its embedding space. There are both theoretical and experimental reasons to believe this to be true. If you believe this, then the task of a classification algorithm is fundamentally to separate a bunch of tangled manifolds.
I don’t understand the whole post, or the whole argument (yet? not to a great level of detail anyway), but: if you want to build a neural network that distinguishes cat and dog pictures, in the worst case that would seem to require a huge network with many more nodes/layers (say, a function of the size of the image) than the number that seems to work reasonably well in practice (six or some other low constant number observed in reality). So the number of dimensions over which the "images" are potentially spread is huge, but it’d seem that in the real world one can rearrange the dog and cat images in a "shape" that then allows for relatively easy disentanglement, and these shapes can probably be realized in much lower dimensions (as per the example, six?). This could explain the observed predictive power of relatively small neural networks.
P.D.: almost unrelated, but the author’s pic is pretty awesome. I mean it.
[[P- Chris Granger]]: Yeah, I probably didn’t do a good job explaining this, but my stance is that there’s a sort of layered dictionary approach where your personal dictionary is always the highest priority and failing to find it there cascades down into a hierarchy of definitions and synonyms. It’s ridiculous to me though that I have to explain what "annual contract value" is to every tool. Within a domain, things often have accepted definitions and they should just be available to me to use directly or tweak to my liking without me having to systematically describe every aspect of them. Similarly though, there will be lots of words that are unique to me and I should have just as much power to define them.
Notes from dweb talk
[[esteroids]]
[[ceno browser]]
[[mask.io]]
The editing process is as involved as you want it to be, depending on the desired quality of your final product. In the editing process of the WAIDH podcast, I wanted the final audio to sound as perfect was possible, with an editing focus on both audio quality and content.
Note: I use Logic Pro X for editing. This is the same software I use for music production and other audio projects. The Logic Pro features I use in this blog post will be available in any editing software (although they might look a little different); don’t feel as though you need to purchase the same software as me to achieve these results, as there are [many other popular options.](https://www.thepodcasthost.com/editing-production/best-podcast- editing-software/)
Audio editing is a combination of cutting irrelevant sounds, adjusting volume levels, and applying software edits such as EQ and compression.
When you’re speaking in conversation, you probably say more filler words than you realize. These filler words include “um, like, uhh,” and similar noises. In conversation, these aren’t jarring - in fact, they usually help the conversation flow better. However, in a podcast setting where listeners are intently listening to your conversation , removing these words will make your podcast sound more professional.
The best editing offense is a good editing defense. That is, i **f you and your guest don’t use any filler words in the first place, you won’t have to worry about removing them **in the editing process. It’s up to you if you want to advise your guest of this. Warning them can save you some time in the future, but it may make them worry about saying filler words, which could remove a level of natural comfort from their responses.
Here’s an example of an edit I would make in the WAIDH podcast…

In this example, I would delete the fourth section. It’s important to leave in conversational replies (such as the second section) even if they don’t “add” anything to the final audio. It’s also important to leave in dynamics, such as inhales and exhales. Removing these may shorten your final product, but it will sound unnatural if nobody breathes the entire time.
Sometimes, there will be a loud noise in the recording room. This could be a cough, a clap, or some uncontrollable outside noise such as someone dropping a heavy object the floor above you. Other times, you’ll make a cut like I outlined above and the beginning or end of the edited audio file will have an annoying “click” noise. **In either of these cases, volume editing is a viable solution. **Later in this post, I also cover compression, which is another solution for these types of problems.
Here are three volume editing examples from our interview with Michael Hernke…
(The yellow line represents the volume levels)

This resulted from a rough edit I made. There was a "pop" at the end of it that I couldn’t cut without removing part of the previous word (which made it sound weird). So I brought the volume down for a fraction of a second, eliminating the pop while preserving the sound of the word.

In this case, Michael Hernke made a wonderful point towards the end of the podcast, but got much quieter as he finished the sentence. I raised the volume level as he did so, then lowered it right afterwards so Chase’s response wasn’t overpowering.

In this third example, someone made a joke and everyone laughed. In the midst of the laughter, someone’s foot hit the leg of the table, which caused a loud momentary noise. I reduced the volume of the entire laughter, then essentially muted the audio for a millisecond when the table was kicked.
Over the course of editing an entire podcast, I’ll end up making a lot of edits.

In this interview, my final count was 210 edits, which took around four hours of dedicated work.
Of course, the level of editing coincides with the podcast style you’re aiming for. Some content creators, such as Gary Vee, release their podcasts with no editing, and their fans are perfectly fine with it. The final decision is up to you.
The final part of audio quality editing is EQ and compression. Understanding these concepts takes time; luckily, there are plenty of online resources that can point you in the right direction. For the purposes of this blog post, I’ll give you a brief overview of the concepts. The looks and workings of EQ and compression will differ depending on your editing software, so be sure to look them up specific to what you’re editing with.
EQ software allows you to boost or reduce the volume of different frequencies. This allows you to improve the overall sound of the conversation, no matter who is speaking. Having a good microphone is important, but even mid- to low- quality microphones can be drastically improved using EQ.

In Logic Pro, I use an EQ preset called "Speaking Voice Improve". It reduces the lowest frequencies, boosts the mids, and slightly increases the highest frequencies. This results in a nice volume balance that makes the interview better to listen to.
If your EQ software has presets, I recommend messing around with them to see which one sounds the best with your audio.
Compression is less intuitive than EQ. Essentially, compressors compress the audio signal so the loudest parts aren’t as loud and the quieter parts get boosted.

I used a preset called "Narration Vocal" for this interview, which offered me a suitable level of gain reduction in the loudest parts while boosting the quieter parts when I needed it.
Editing for content is a different type of ballgame. Content editing requires you to evaluate the conversation of the podcast as a whole. In order to preserve the concision and idea of a single podcast, you must sometimes remove entire tangents of conversation. Removing these irrelevant tangents is difficult but often necessary to achieve a polished end product.
Content editing can also include rearranging. If the end of the interview had an important idea that would go better at the beginning, it can be within the power of the editor to move it. You must be careful when doing so, however, because it can sometimes be easy to tell when a large movement like this has been made.
As with audio quality editing, though, some podcasters don’t mind if their podcast doesn’t feel like a cohesive conversation. Moving parts around and harshly cutting conversations off after they become less useful can be jarring at first, but ultimately useful for a listener who wants to hear nothing but the best pieces of an interview. This choice is ultimately up to the producer and editor - **capture the style that you want to create and the right listeners will appreciate it! **
[[Global heating]].
This is bad because [[The ocean plays a critical role in maintaining a stable climate]].


#empowering #life-coaching #coach #conversation #communication #mad
if you had knowledge of the future you could build a perfect scheduler
have people pitch your pitch to test communication [[generosity of leadership]]
[[leaderful organizations]] - leaderful organizing cheatsheet from CivicTechTO: https://hackmd.io/@patcon/rygFHjOtr
[[facttic]]
WIP
The other day I walked in front of the beautiful building of the police of [[kreis 4]] of Zürich and I thought of turning myself in. Would you like to read about it?
[[yes]] [[no]] [[maybe]]
The other day I walked in front of the beautiful building of the police of [[kreis 4]] of Zürich and I thought of turning myself in. Would you like to read about it?

Общий стиль вдохновлён художником, чьё имя я забыл. Он такие глаза вот рисует

На фоне первый абзац русского издания Moby-dick от издательства АСТ. В кафе, где я это рисовал, рядом лежало это издание, вот я оттуда и взял.
Изображён я, вернее, моя злость.

Privacy-preserving, digital-self-determination-enabling extensions can be written easily in [[Manifest v4]], and run optimally.
[[Web extensions]] wise: I heard that [[Manifest v3]] didn’t turn out great, so I’ve started drafting [[Manifest v4]].

Learn more about Conductor.
Is [[mastodon 4]] generally thought to be more or less performant than [[mastodon 3]]?
We need to do upgrades to the social.coop instance in this direction but we’re wondering about any potential performance regressions.
Is [[mastodon 4]] generally thought to be more or less performant than [[mastodon 3]]?
We need to do upgrades to the https://t.co/lG1n70TgZr instance in this direction but we’re wondering about any potential performance regressions.
I had to copy and paste the link of this toot to [[quote post]]… but not for much longer as this functionality is planned for [[Mastodon 4.4]]!






































Portable spectating unit 2TX consists of 2 hanging segmented creatures with limited intelligence. They lack weapons. A 2TX frame can be installed on the standard T frame.
The big box is the CPU. A body consisting of 5 lightly armored segments is connected to it. The head has a 110 º field of view. Up to 4 2TX units can be installed in a series. The horn on the head is not decorative, it serves a purpose.


Workshop 1

Il y a un allusion à La Trahison des images.

Windy day ~


This is the same bird robot as in Inktober 2022/16 Fowl.
[[Digital ecosocialism]] is a counter to [[digital capitalism]], and reclaiming the stacks is focused on the transition from the latter to the former.
While I’m more interested in building the new world than theorising the old, it’s true that you need to have an understanding of the current conditions in order to change them.
So, it’s important to understand - just what is [[digital capitalism]]? We probably all have a rough notion of what we mean by it - essentially, whatever it is that the [[Big Tech]] firms do ([[The purpose of a system is what it does]]). But there’s obviously a lot of fine-grained detail within that.
Two great resources have just dropped that will be of interest to anyone who wants a more thorough understanding:
I’m slowly working my way through the [[Digital Capitalism online course]]. It’s a trove of well-presented learnings on digital capitalism - what it is, why it’s bad, and what we could do instead.
I’m also dipping into [[Critical Perspectives on Digital Capitalism: Theories and Praxis]] here and there - it’s much more dense and academic, but people like [[Christian Fuchs]] and [[Jodi Dean]] have been theorising on this for a long time, so you know it’s going to be good.


A budget for big earners and big owners ([[Jeremy Hunt’s election budget for big earners and big owners]]).
It’s not good for public services.
At #systemsinnovation2024 and as I got to cycle here - memories of @RedQuadrant above the British Interplanetary Society, it’s in Oval. London -I took a big gamble. No coffee 😂
Give me a shout if you’re here. And if you know the real hashtag
First session exploring OurCluj in Cluj Napoca, Romania - mapping, community engagement, collaborative governance with Barbara Bulc. https://ourcluj.city/system-map/
#systemsinnovation2024
Andy Wilkins at #systemsinnovation2024 talking about using the ‘three horizons’ framework (IFF not McKinsey) to look at all the health megatrends hitting together… am itching to have a chat and talk practice!
Phrase of the day at #SystemsInnovation2024 - and phrase of the season on my podcasts -is ‘right relationship’. Like this https://humansandnature.org/humans-nature-the-right-relationship/
I understand it from Buddhism but it seems to have the perfect ‘venn’ of ‘indigenous’, Judaism,Christian, Quaker, systems, justice movements, deep ecology….
#
Missed a lot of #publicsector panel at #SystemsInnovation2024 due to passionat convo about #publicservices… good stuff though from a policy perspective. Indy Johar, always good value - is he our Schmachtenberger? V big picture on possible futures… want to ask him why insurers not a big part of the picture!
Louis Klein and Karima Kadaoui engage in ‘rearranging the room’ to change the audience incentives as an illustration of ‘a shared understanding of metamorphic transformation’ at #SystemsInnovation2024 - ‘the best place to hide a treasure is behind a treasure’
Kickoff of #SystemsInnovation2024 and Miranda Dixon of Brink gives an #innovation #mission story of #SystemsChange which is actually incredibly practical for #procurement and #commissioning - getting oxygen concentrators where they were needed - with a #learning approach.
Teun Sljuis giving very practical examples of the use of System Dynamics and system mapping in real-world situations at #SystemsInnovation2024, from introduction of one-way streets to type 2 diabetes.
How can we disperse systems | complexity | cybernetics thinking into the ambience of organisations? https://buff.ly/3Zh9NHg
What happens when #systemsthinking clashes with traditional organisations?
At #SystemsInnovation2024 I facilitated a brilliant trio to unpack the challenges and opportunities that emerge when introducing systems approaches into complex environments.
Workshop session on ‘Shifting from Competitors to Collaborators for Systems Innovation: The ‘How’ of Enabling Pre-competitive Collaboration’ raising super interesting questions at #SystemsInnovation2024 - relationships valued over success, Tom Daly’s relationship with his swimming coach, and how can nice systems people reckon with evil, with sociopaths?
Mariana Mirabile talks at #SystemsInnovation2024 about working to move from a reactive visible level to a joined-up systemic level in Dublin’s climate action planning.
The second tech meet, after a long pause. The text in this hypha was typed by the attendess.
Attending:
Timur
This time, not on Discord, but on Jitsi. Jitsi worked fine, unlike Discord, with which there were some sound problems.
Matrix is an open-source federated messaging platform.
Uxn is a fantasy computer, virtual machine.
Melanocarpa is Timur's digital garden.
the tour bus system
Agora — an aggregator for digital gardens
"Flancia!"— flancia.org — a vision of a future lifestyle
FedWiki vs Mycorrhiza federation approach:
Boucepaw's vision:
link, transclude, log in across wikis
Mycorrhiza wants to be a "rock" - stable, solid
Fedwiki's vision:
SmallTalk & wiki link somehow (?)
plugins, Javascript
"Your wiki is your website, and nobody else edits it. Instead, it's forked, and the fork is edited."
Fedwiki is like "water" - fluid, liquid
Lion's Pamphlet system written in Tcl/Tk. Text data stored in one LSF format, images are in a separate folder and can be Ctrl+Ved.
Tiled map. Tile, grid vs no grid.
Tried out tree sheets. Kinda fun. It seems they have their own home-grown application format :-(
What Lion likes about Lua:
It's C. It's primitive C.
It's Dictionary-based. ("Tables")
It's Globals-based.
Lion loves Python just like he loves his wife.
Making a programmer community in Seattle. A long monologue about community-building and philosophy.

"Deconstructing Sony’s video game console is a mind-bending trip into carbon-intensive global electronics"
Carbon-intensive global electronics.
it occurs to me that the PlayStation 4 has the most dazzling and problematic parts of global capitalism purring in unison.
It is an exquisite, leanly designed machine pulsing with the exploitation of Earth and its people.
In an effort to explore both the environmental and human impacts of Sony’s current video game console, I decided to take one apart. Under its plastic hood, I discovered a machine that spans continents and deep time, touches thousands of lives (for better and worse), and leaves an indelible, measurable stain on Earth and its atmosphere.
The case is made from [[ABS]] (so is Lego apparently)
steel
POM (cogs for the blue ray drive)
aluminium (heatsink)
gold (PCB)
tin (PCB)
copper (PCB)
neodynium
[[lithium]] (battery in controller)
It’s quite possible that the tin-based solder in your PlayStation 4, which is the glue holding its vital computerized parts together, originated from such deep exploitation.
“You miniaturize the product, and you maximize your carbon footprint,” Barlow said. “Even though it’s very little material, the processing energy is absolutely huge, and the end of life is almost impossible. It’s basically single-use.”
The equivalent of 89 kilograms of carbon dioxide is emitted into the atmosphere with the production and transportation of every PlayStation 4.
Since the PlayStation 4’s release in 2013, approximately 8.9 billion kilograms of carbon dioxide have been generated and subsequently released into the atmosphere.
A [[Thinkpad]] with good [[repairability]].
To define high level goals for the Tech Working Group of Social.Coop to explore during 2024, and request review/comment from the wider community.
These are projects currently being run by the Tech Working Group, together with high level next steps we have identified for them. They are in priority order:
To define high level goals for the Tech Working Group of Social.Coop to explore during 2024, and request review/comment from the wider community.
These are projects currently being run by the Tech Working Group, together with high level next steps we have identified for them. They are in priority order:
To define high level goals for the Tech Working Group of Social.Coop to explore during 2024, and request review/comment from the wider community.
These are projects currently being run by the Tech Working Group, together with high level next steps we have identified for them. They are in priority order:
To define high level goals for the Tech Working Group of Social.Coop to explore during 2024, and request review/comment from the wider community.
These are projects currently being run by the Tech Working Group, together with high level next steps we have identified for them. They are in priority order:
First [[Ulverston Repair Cafe]] in a few months for me.
I helped a chap making the connection between his MacBook Air and his BBC Micro:Bit.
And I looked at an old slow Dell Vostro laptop for someone - but didn’t get much time on this, beyond explaining to them how to back up some old files.
I wonder what’s the best app for benchmarking the performance of a Windows machine - to then report whether your changes have made a difference.
Second month back after being away for a few.
Looked at a couple of slow laptops.
A Dell Vostro. A bit of a long-term project for one of the other volunteers - today just backing up important files, which took about 2 hours running in the background.
An Asus running Windows 10.
intelligent trees
tree fungi distributes resources
you have to plant your plants in someone elses garden
https://www.economist.com/business/2020/10/22/who-owns-the-webs-data
https://community.webmonetization.org/understory/understory-final-grant-report-4ld5
what if we could build a platform that could moneitize your content
garden gates
next.js
platform coops
data coops
wow cool
wow cool
wow cool
wow cool